Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Apr 15;55(8):1679-85.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850415)55:8<1679::aid-cncr2820550812>3.0.co;2-c.

Distinction of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma. An immunohistochemical approach

Distinction of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma. An immunohistochemical approach

H Battifora et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

The authors investigated the expression of keratin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and an epithelial marker derived from milk fat globule membranes in 12 mesotheliomas and 100 diverse adenocarcinomas with immunohistochemical methods. The authors employed a monoclonal antibody to keratin designated as AE1, as well as the following commercially available antisera: rabbit anti-whole human keratin, rabbit anti-CEA, and a monoclonal antibody to an epithelial factor designated as MFG-2. Expression of keratin was found in all the mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas with antibody AE1 as well as with the rabbit antiserum; CEA was detectable in 65% of the adenocarcinomas but two mesotheliomas also reacted weakly. With antibody MFG-2, positive results were obtained in 85% of the adenocarcinomas and in none of the mesotheliomas. All of 64 (100%) breast-, lung- and ovary-derived adenocarcinomas immunostained positively with antibody MFG-2. This is of particular significance because pulmonary and ovarian adenocarcinoma frequently may be indistinguishable clinically and histologically from epithelial mesothelioma. The authors conclude that antikeratin antibodies are not useful in the distinction of adenocarcinoma from mesothelioma. Because of its greater sensitivity and specificity, MFG-2 is superior to CEA in this differential diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources