Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 2;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S3.
doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-9-S1-S3. eCollection 2015.

Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies

Sara E Casey  1 , Sarah K Chynoweth  2 , Nadine Cornier  3 , Meghan C Gallagher  1 , Erin E Wheeler  1
Affiliations

Progress and gaps in reproductive health services in three humanitarian settings: mixed-methods case studies

Sara E Casey et al. Confl Health. .

Abstract

Background: Reproductive health (RH) care is an essential component of humanitarian response. Women and girls living in humanitarian settings often face high maternal mortality and are vulnerable to unwanted pregnancy, unsafe abortion, and sexual violence. This study explored the availability and quality of, and access barriers to RH services in three humanitarian settings in Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and South Sudan.

Methods: Data collection was conducted between July and October 2013. In total, 63 purposively selected health facilities were assessed: 28 in Burkina Faso, 25 in DRC, and nine in South Sudan, and 42 providers completed a questionnaire to assess RH knowledge and attitudes. Thirty-four focus group discussions were conducted with 29 members of the host communities and 273 displaced married and unmarried women and men to understand access barriers.

Results: All facilities reported providing some RH services in the prior three months. Five health facilities in Burkina Faso, six in DRC, and none in South Sudan met the criteria as a family planning service delivery point. Two health facilities in Burkina Faso, one in DRC, and two in South Sudan met the criteria as an emergency obstetric and newborn care service delivery point. Across settings, three facilities in DRC adequately provided selected elements of clinical management of rape. Safe abortion was unavailable. Many providers lacked essential knowledge and skills. Focus groups revealed limited knowledge of available RH services and socio-cultural barriers to accessing them, although participants reported a remarkable increase in use of facility-based delivery services.

Conclusion: Although RH services are being provided, the availability of good quality RH services was inconsistent across settings. Commodity management and security must be prioritized to ensure consistent availability of essential supplies. It is critical to improve the attitudes, managerial and technical capacity of providers to ensure that RH services are delivered respectfully and efficiently. In addition to ensuring systematic implementation of good quality RH services, humanitarian health actors should meaningfully engage crisis-affected communities in RH programming to increase understanding and use of this life-saving care.

Keywords: Burkina Faso; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Reproductive health; South Sudan; humanitarian; refugees.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. UNFPA. State of the world population. New York; 2005.
    1. Banatvala N, Zwi AB. Public health and humanitarian interventions: developing the evidence base. BMJ. 2000;321:101–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7253.101. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Austin J, Guy S, Lee-Jones L, McGinn T, Schlecht J. Reproductive health: a right for refugees and internally displaced persons. Reprod Health Matter. 2008;16:10–21. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31351-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. UNHCR. Global Trends Report 2013. Geneva; 2014.
    1. Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Refugee Situations. Report of an inter-agency global evaluation of reproductive health services for refugees and internally displaced persons. Geneva; 2004.