Routine outcome measures in Germany
- PMID: 25800080
- DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1014025
Routine outcome measures in Germany
Abstract
The German healthcare system offers comprehensive coverage for people with mental illness including inpatient, day hospital and outpatient services. These services are primarily financed through the statutory health and pension insurances. According to legal regulations, providers are required to base their services on current scientific evidence and to continuously assure the quality of their services. This paper gives an overview of recent initiatives to develop, evaluate and disseminate routine outcome measurement (ROM) in service settings in Germany. A large number of projects have shown outcome monitoring to be feasible, and that feedback of outcome may enhance routine care through an improved allocation of treatment resources. However, none of these initiatives have been integrated into routine care on a nationwide or trans-sectoral level, and their sustainability has been limited. This is due to various barriers in a fragmented mental health service system and to the lack of coordinated national or state-level service planning. The time is ripe for a concerted effort including policy-makers to pick up on these initiatives and move them towards wide-spread implementation in routine care accompanied by practice-oriented research including service user involvement.
Similar articles
-
Routine outcome measurement in Australia.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(4):264-75. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.977234. Epub 2015 Mar 13. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25768326 Review.
-
Development of indicators for a nationwide cross-sectoral quality assurance procedure for mental health care of patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders in Germany.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Oct;126:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Oct 11. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017. PMID: 29029972
-
Routine outcome measures in Canada.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(4):286-95. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.994594. Epub 2015 Mar 4. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25738745 Review.
-
Using Routine Outcome Measures to Provide Feedback at the Service Agency Level.Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):1022-1032. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0039-x. Epub 2016 Jun 20. Community Ment Health J. 2016. PMID: 27324903
-
Outcome measurement in New Zealand.Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(4):276-85. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1023783. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 25832565 Review.
Cited by
-
Identifying studies examining the validity of instruments for use as outcome measures in child and adolescent forensic mental health services: a systematic review.Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;34(2):519-533. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02514-7. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 39110192 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Content Validity of the Revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS 2018).Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169895. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36011532 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals Towards the Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapeutic Inpatient Settings: A Thematic Analysis.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jul;52(4):771-784. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01455-w. Epub 2025 Jul 1. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025. PMID: 40591161 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) family of measures: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e021177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021177. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29678991 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of Austrian Psychotherapists Towards Process and Outcome Monitoring.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Sep;45(5):765-779. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0862-1. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018. PMID: 29520535 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources