Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;54(10):1796-804.
doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016624. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

Predicting radiation-induced valvular heart damage

Affiliations

Predicting radiation-induced valvular heart damage

Laura Cella et al. Acta Oncol. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a predictive multivariate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for radiation-induced heart valvular damage (RVD). The influence of combined heart-lung irradiation on RVD development was included.

Material and methods: Multivariate logistic regression modeling with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to build an NTCP model to predict RVD based on a cohort of 90 Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with sequential chemo-radiation therapy. In addition to heart irradiation factors, clinical variables, along with left and right lung dose-volume histogram statistics, were included in the analysis. To avoid overfitting, 10-fold cross-validation (CV) was used for LASSO logistic regression modeling, with 50 reshuffled cycles. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and Spearman's correlation coefficient (Rs).

Results: At a median follow-up time of 55 months (range 12-92 months) after the end of radiation treatment, 27 of 90 patients (30%) manifested at least one kind of RVD (mild or moderate), with a higher incidence of left-sided valve defects (64%). Fourteen prognostic factors were frequently selected (more than 100/500 model fits) by LASSO, which included mainly heart and left lung dosimetric variables along with their volume variables. The averaged cross-validated performance was AUC-CV = 0.685 and Rs = 0.293. The overall performance of a final NTCP model for RVD obtained applying LASSO logistic regression to the full dataset was satisfactory (AUC = 0.84, Rs = 0.55, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: LASSO proved to be an improved and flexible modeling method for variable selection. Applying LASSO, we showed, for the first time, the importance of jointly considering left lung irradiation and left lung volume size in the prediction of subclinical radiation-related heart disease resulting in RVD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) List of the 26 candidate variables and (b) their selection frequencies by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression models during 10-fold cross validation with 50 iterations. Variables are named by their index numbers as listed in (a). The red dashed-line indicates the frequency of occurrence of 100; 14 variables are selected more than 100 times. (c) Deviance values of the LASSO models as a function of the regularization parameter λ. The optimal penalty λ, determined by 10-fold cross-validation, is the value that minimizes the deviance curve. The plot identifies the minimum-deviance (dashed line λ0) and the minimum deviance within one standard error (dashed line λ1) from λ0. (d) Trace plot showing nonzero model coefficients as a function of the regularization parameter λ. As λ increases to the left, LASSO sets various coefficients to zero, removing them from the model. When λ corresponds to the minimum-deviance (dashed line λ0), 12 variables are selected. When λ corresponds to the minimum-deviance within one standard error (dashed line λ1) from λ0, 8 variables are selected.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of prediction performance for LASSO logistic regression method and logistic regression method: a) box plot for AUC; b) box plot for Rs; c) box plot for p values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean predicted rates of radiation induced valvular defects in binned groups (a) and calibration plot between the observed and predicted rates (b). The patients were binned into 5 groups based on the observed toxicity, with 1 being the lowest toxicity group and 5 being with the highest, with the equal number of patients (18) in each group.

References

    1. Jaworski C, Mariani JA, Wheeler G, Kaye DM. Cardiac complications of thoracic irradiation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(23):2319–2328. - PubMed
    1. Lancellotti P, Nkomo VT, Badano LP, Bergler-Klein J, Bogaert J, Davin L, et al. Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging. 2013;14(8):721–740. - PubMed
    1. Ghobadi G, van der Veen S, Bartelds B, de Boer RA, Dickinson MG, de Jong JR, et al. Physiological interaction of heart and lung in thoracic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(5):e639–e646. - PubMed
    1. van Luijk P, Faber H, Meertens H, Schippers JM, Langendijk JA, Brandenburg S, et al. The impact of heart irradiation on dose-volume effects in the rat lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(2):552–559. - PubMed
    1. Andratschke N, Maurer J, Molls M, Trott KR. Late radiation-induced heart disease after radiotherapy. Clinical importance, radiobiological mechanisms and strategies of prevention. Radiother Oncol. 2010 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources