Fifteen-year Outcomes Following Conservative Management Among Men Aged 65 Years or Older with Localized Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 25800944
- PMCID: PMC4575827
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.03.021
Fifteen-year Outcomes Following Conservative Management Among Men Aged 65 Years or Older with Localized Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Background: To understand the threat posed by localized prostate cancer and the potential impact of surgery or radiation, patients and healthcare providers require information on long-term outcomes following conservative management.
Objective: To describe 15-yr survival outcomes and cancer therapy utilization among men 65 years and older managed conservatively for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.
Design, settings, and participants: This is a population-based cohort study with participants living in predefined geographic areas covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The study includes 31 137 Medicare patients aged ≥65 yr diagnosed with localized prostate cancer in 1992-2009 who initially received conservative management (no surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, or androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]). All patients were followed until death or December 31, 2009 (for prostate cancer-specific mortality [PCSM]) and December 31, 2011 (for overall mortality).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Competing-risk analyses were used to examine PCSM, overall mortality, and utilization of cancer therapies.
Results and limitations: The 15-yr risk of PCSM for men aged 65-74 yr diagnosed with screening-detected prostate cancer was 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-8.0%) for T1c Gleason 5-7 and 22% (95% CI 16-35%) for Gleason 8-10 disease. After 15 yr of follow-up, 24% (95% CI 21-27%) of men aged 65-74 yr with screening-detected Gleason 5-7 cancer received ADT. The corresponding result for men with Gleason 8-10 cancer was 38% (95% CI 32-44%). The major study limitations are the lack of data for men aged <65 yr and detailed clinical information associated with secondary cancer therapy.
Conclusions: The 15-yr outcomes following conservative management of newly diagnosed Gleason 5-7 prostate cancer among men aged ≥65 yr are excellent. Men with Gleason 8-10 disease managed conservatively face a significant risk of PCSM.
Patient summary: We examined the long-term survival outcomes for a large group of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who did not have surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, or androgen deprivation therapy in the first 6 mo after cancer diagnosis. We found that the 15-yr disease-specific survival is excellent for men diagnosed with Gleason 5-7 disease. The data support conservative management as a reasonable choice for elderly patients with low-grade localized prostate cancer.
Keywords: Population-based study; Prostatic neoplasm; Survival.
Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures

Comment in
-
A Brief Survey of Active Surveillance.Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):812-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25913066 No abstract available.
-
Re: Grace L. Lu-Yao, Peter C. Albertsen, Dirk F. Moore, Yong Lin, Robert S. DiPaola, Siu-Long Yao. Fifteen-year Outcomes Following Conservative Management Among Men aged 65 Years or Older with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2015;68:805-11.Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):e130. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.032. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 26683758 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Michael Froehner, Rainer Koch, Manfred P. Wirth's Letter to the Editor re: Grace L. Lu-Yao, Peter C. Albertsen, Dirk F. Moore, Yong Lin, Robert S. DiPaola, Siu-Long Yao. Fifteen-year Outcomes Following Conservative Management Among Men Aged 65 Years or Older with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2015;68:805-11.Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):e131-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.031. Epub 2015 Dec 22. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 26706104 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Fifteen-year survival outcomes following primary androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Sep;174(9):1460-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3028. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25023796 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality After Prostatectomy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, Hormonal Therapy, or Monitoring for Localized Prostate Cancer.Eur Urol. 2024 Jun;85(6):565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Oct 17. Eur Urol. 2024. PMID: 37858454
-
Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Low-Prostate-specific Antigen, High-grade Prostate Cancer.Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 22. Eur Urol. 2018. PMID: 29478736 Free PMC article.
-
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8. Prescrire Int. 2012. PMID: 23185849 Review.
-
Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation therapy only for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 12;12(12):CD013245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013245.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33314020 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Outcome of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Men Over 74.J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):106-110. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0512. Epub 2018 Jan 24. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 29232985 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization and predictors of expectant management among elderly men with low-and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer in U.S. urological practice.Urol Pract. 2017 Mar;4(2):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.05.005. Urol Pract. 2017. PMID: 28808670 Free PMC article.
-
[Recommendations CCAFU on the management of cancers of the urogenital system during an epidemic with Coronavirus COVID-19].Prog Urol. 2020 Apr;30(5):221-231. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 30. Prog Urol. 2020. PMID: 32224294 Free PMC article. French.
-
Undertreatment of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer in the California Latino Population.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Nov;16(11):1353-1360. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7060. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018. PMID: 30442735 Free PMC article.
-
The Dilemma of Misclassification Rates in Senior Patients With Prostate Cancer, Who Were Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Patient Counseling and Diagnostics.Front Surg. 2022 Feb 16;9:838477. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.838477. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35252339 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
-
- Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–1984. - PubMed
-
- Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1708–1717. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical