Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in clinical practice. A re-examination of stepped-care: a retrospective and a prospective
- PMID: 2580166
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in clinical practice. A re-examination of stepped-care: a retrospective and a prospective
Abstract
Diuretics have so far enjoyed a prominent position in all stepped-care programs, as the preferred first choice drug in most American schemes or as an alternative first choice drug with respect to beta-blockers in the WHO scheme. Among various reasons for this prominence has been that antihypertensive drugs available until recently all gradually led to sodium and water retention, and therefore required to be combined with a diuretic. This is no longer true: several antihypertensive agents are available now that do not require combination with diuretics, these new agents including not only beta-blockers but also angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium entry blockers. Furthermore, some concern about the metabolic effects of diuretics has recently been raised, especially because of the failure to prevent coronary heart disease by the current diuretic-based antihypertensive regimens. Without denying the importance that diuretics have had in the past in making antihypertensive therapy successful and their continuing essential role in treating severe hypertension, it is likely, in my opinion, that in future years diuretics are going to be more often used as agents of second choice, mostly in combination with beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, and, perhaps, some of the calcium blockers. In conclusion, although opinions of various experts about the sequence of choices between antihypertensive drugs may obviously differ, there is no doubt that the addition of new classes of effective agents, such as the ACE inhibitors and the calcium entry blockers, is making antihypertensive therapy more flexible and more easily suitable to the needs of individual patients.
Similar articles
-
Drug therapy for hypertension in the elderly.J Fam Pract. 1989 Jan;28(1):81-7. J Fam Pract. 1989. PMID: 2563274 Review.
-
[Recent intervention studies with antihypertensive drugs and their influence on guidelines].Med Klin (Munich). 2003 Dec 15;98(12):771-5. doi: 10.1007/s00063-003-1323-4. Med Klin (Munich). 2003. PMID: 14685679 Review. German.
-
[Are the newer antihypertensive agents better and more effective than diuretics?].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Feb 28;121(6):701-5. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001. PMID: 11293353 Review. Norwegian.
-
[Hypertension therapies compared. Are the new nevertheless better than the old?].MMW Fortschr Med. 2005 Mar 24;147(12):6, 8. MMW Fortschr Med. 2005. PMID: 15832780 German. No abstract available.
-
Combination antihypertensive drugs: recommendations for use.Am Fam Physician. 2000 May 15;61(10):3049-56. Am Fam Physician. 2000. PMID: 10839554
Cited by
-
Rationale for combination therapy.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15S-19S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03118.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987. PMID: 3555582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fixed-dose combinations as initial therapy for hypertension: a review of approved agents and a guide to patient selection.Drugs. 2009;69(13):1761-76. doi: 10.2165/11316710-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19719332 Review.
-
Choosing the correct drug for the individual hypertensive patient.Drugs. 1992;44 Suppl 1:147-55. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199200441-00028. Drugs. 1992. PMID: 1283579 Review.
-
Individualised selection of antihypertensive therapy.Drugs. 1993;46 Suppl 2:142-8. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199300462-00023. Drugs. 1993. PMID: 7512467 Review.
-
First-line treatment in hypertension. Role of perindopril.Drugs. 1990;39 Suppl 1:71-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199000391-00011. Drugs. 1990. PMID: 2407495 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous