Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects
- PMID: 25802124
- DOI: 10.1007/s11748-015-0538-7
Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects
Abstract
Objectives: Although implantable left ventricular assist device use as a bridge to heart transplantation is increasing, its permanent use as destination therapy is not permitted in Japan. This retrospective review assessed early and mid-term outcomes of implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device compared with extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Issues regarding left ventricular assist device as destination therapy are discussed.
Methods: From January 2009 to September 2013, 72 patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation at our institute. Forty patients were supported by extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices (ex-VAD group) and 32 patients with implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (im-VAD group).
Results: The median duration of ventricular assist device support was 563 days. The actuarial survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 92.3 and 79.2 % in the ex-VAD group and 96.4 and 72.3 % in the im-VAD group, respectively. Approximately 50 % of patients in both groups developed cerebrovascular complications within 1 year postoperatively. Six months post-implantation, almost 90 % of the ex-VAD group patients suffered exit-site infection compared with about 50 % in the im-VAD group. Readmission rate was 1.74 per patient-year; major causes were driveline exit-site infection (52 %) and cerebrovascular complication (14 %).
Conclusions: Early and mid-term outcomes were satisfactory after both extracorporeal pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device and implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation, although a considerable level of postoperative complications was observed. More data after left ventricular assist device surgery are needed to enable its consideration as a destination therapy option in Japan.
Keywords: Bridge to transplant; Destination therapy; Heart transplantation; Left ventricular assist device.
Comment in
-
Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;63(10):537-9. doi: 10.1007/s11748-015-0580-5. Epub 2015 Aug 19. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26281777 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23321132
-
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20447659
-
Improved outcomes from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus ventricular assist device temporary support of primary graft dysfunction in heart transplant.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jun;36(6):650-656. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 23. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017. PMID: 28087104
-
[Ventricular assist device and heart transplantation in Japan].Masui. 2009 Mar;58(3):327-36. Masui. 2009. PMID: 19306633 Review. Japanese.
-
Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease.World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2023 Nov;14(6):708-715. doi: 10.1177/21501351231181105. Epub 2023 Aug 23. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2023. PMID: 37609822 Review.
Cited by
-
Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):186-208. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-cfmcs-35. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33842214 Free PMC article.
-
Matters to address prior to introducing new life support technology in Japan: three serious ethical concerns related to the use of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy and suggested policies to deal with them.BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0251-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 29482542 Free PMC article.
-
Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;63(10):537-9. doi: 10.1007/s11748-015-0580-5. Epub 2015 Aug 19. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26281777 No abstract available.
-
Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections.J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 25;10(3):453. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030453. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33503891 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of Asian-Americans Implanted With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: An Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Analysis.Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Aug;29(8):1226-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.11.017. Epub 2019 Dec 13. Heart Lung Circ. 2020. PMID: 32085955 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical