Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 1;4(3):75-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.004. eCollection 2010.

Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications

Kenneth Vaz  1 , Kushagra Verma  1 , Themistocles Protopsaltis  1 , Frank Schwab  1 , Baron Lonner  1 , Thomas Errico  1
Affiliations

Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications

Kenneth Vaz et al. SAS J. .

Abstract

Background: Iliac crest harvest has been considered the "gold standard" at producing successful arthrodesis of the lumbar spine but is also associated with many donor-site morbidities. Many alternatives have been used to avoid iliac crest harvest, including autologous bone from other donor sites, allogeneic bone, ceramics, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMPs). This review will highlight the properties and preparations of these graft types and their potential complications and reported clinical efficacy.

Methods: A Medline search was conducted via PubMed by use of the following terms in various combinations: lumbar fusion, freeze-dried allograft, fresh-frozen allograft, autograft, iliac crest, demineralized bone matrix, rhBMP-2, rhBMP-7, scoliosis, bone marrow aspirate, HEALOS, coralline hydroxyapatite, beta tricalcium phosphate, synthetic, ceramics, spinal fusion, PLF, PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF. Only articles written in English were assessed for appropriate material. Related articles were also assessed depending on the content of articles found in the original literature search.

Conclusions: Although iliac crest remains the gold standard, reported success with alternative approaches, especially in combination, has shown promise. Stronger evidence with limited sources of potential bias is necessary to provide a clear picture of their clinical efficacy.

Keywords: Bone graft; Iliac crest; Lumbar fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Boden SD. The ABCs of BMPs. Orthop Nurs. 2005;24:49–52. quiz 53–44. - PubMed
    1. Lee KJ, Roper JG, Wang JC. Demineralized bone matrix and spinal arthrodesis. Spine J. 2005;5(Suppl):217S–23S. - PubMed
    1. Lieberman JR, Friedlaender GE. Bone regeneration and repair: biology and clinical applications. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2005.
    1. Herkowitz HN. The lumbar spine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine.
    1. Korovessis P, Koureas G, Zacharatos S, Papazisis Z, Lambiris E. Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:630–8. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources