Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;43(7):1368-74.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000970.

Temporal Changes in the Influence of Hospitals and Regional Healthcare Networks on Severe Sepsis Mortality

Affiliations

Temporal Changes in the Influence of Hospitals and Regional Healthcare Networks on Severe Sepsis Mortality

Hallie C Prescott et al. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: There is systematic variation between hospitals in their care of severe sepsis, but little information on whether this variation impacts sepsis-related mortality, or how hospitals' and health-systems' impacts have changed over time. We examined whether hospital and regional organization of severe sepsis care is associated with meaningful differences in 30-day mortality in a large integrated health care system, and the extent to which those effects are stable over time.

Design: In this retrospective cohort study, we used risk- and reliability-adjusted hierarchical logistic regression to estimate hospital- and region-level random effects after controlling for severity of illness using a rich mix of administrative and clinical laboratory data.

Setting: One hundred fourteen U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals in 21 geographic regions.

Patients: Forty-three thousand seven hundred thirty-three patients with severe sepsis in 2012, compared to 33,095 such patients in 2008.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The median hospital in the worst quintile of performers had a risk-adjusted 30-day mortality of 16.7% (95% CI, 13.5%, 20.5%) in 2012 compared with the best quintile, which had a risk-adjusted mortality of 12.8% (95% CI, 10.7%, 15.3%). Hospitals and regions explained a statistically and clinically significant proportion of the variation in patient outcomes. Thirty-day mortality after severe sepsis declined from 18.3% in 2008 to 14.7% in 2012 despite very similar severity of illness between years. The proportion of the variance in sepsis-related mortality explained by hospitals and regions was stable between 2008 and 2012.

Conclusions: In this large integrated healthcare system, there is clinically significant variation in sepsis-related mortality associated with hospitals and regions. The proportion of variance explained by hospitals and regions has been stable over time, although sepsis-related mortality has declined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no financial or other disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Variation Between Hospitals in Risk- and Reliability-Adjusted Mortality in 2012
Error bars from the hospital-level random effects are shown at 1.4 times the standard error, indicating that two hospitals have significantly different performance if their error bars do not overlap. Hospitals are ranked by performance. The range of adjusted mortality among hospitals was 10.9%–13.3% for quintile 1, 13.4%–14.4% for quintile 2, 14.5%–15.0% for quintile 3, 15.0%–16.2% for quintile 4, and 16.2%–20.7% for quintile 5.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variation Between Regions in Risk- and Reliability-Adjusted Mortality in 2012
Error bars from the region-level random effects are shown at 1.4 times the standard error, indicating that two regions have significantly different performance if their error bars do not overlap. Regions are ranked by performance.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Changes in Hospital (Upper Panel) and Regional (Lower Panel) Effects on Mortality Between 2008 and 2012
All results are risk- and reliability-adjusted. Each line segment connects the same organization at the 2 time points. Overall regression lines are depicted in bold, with slope and statistical significance listed in the upper right corner.

Comment in

References

    1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit. Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303–1310. - PubMed
    1. Padkin A, Goldfrad C, Brady AR, Young D, Black N, Rowan K. Epidemiology of severe sepsis occurring in the first 24 hrs in intensive care units in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Crit. Care Med. 2003 Sep;31(9):2332–2338. - PubMed
    1. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308–1316. - PubMed
    1. Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR, Wunsch H, Kahn JM. Population burden of long-term survivorship after severe sepsis in older Americans. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1070–1077. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torio CM(AHRQ), Andrews RM(AHRQ) National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2011. HCUP Statistical Brief #160. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. Aug, [Accessed August 19, 2014]. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb160.pdf. - PubMed

Publication types