Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;39(8):2000-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3036-2.

Major Esophageal Dilation After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in Symptomatic Patients: Does It Prevent Effective Weight Loss and How Should It be Treated?

Affiliations

Major Esophageal Dilation After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in Symptomatic Patients: Does It Prevent Effective Weight Loss and How Should It be Treated?

Tom Florian Ulmer et al. World J Surg. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal dilation (ED) has been described as a long-term complication following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with an incidence of 0.5-50%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of major ED on weight loss and find methods to diagnose ED and possible treatment strategies based on a classification.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing LAGB between 2004 and 2008 in three community-based hospitals. ED was classified in four stages of dilation using gastrografin swallow. We report body mass index (BMI), failure rates and reoperations among these patients, with a mean follow-up period of 6.7 years.

Results: Nineteen (18.4%) of 103 patients who underwent LAGB presented with esophageal dilation. Band deflation failed for all nine patients (8.7%) with major ED. The mean BMI at LAGB (BMI 1), revision (BMI 2), and 1 year after conversion (BMI 3) were 45.9±3.2, 42.8±4.9 and 30.3±5.5 kg/m2, respectively. No significant difference was found comparing BMI 1 and BMI 2 (p=0,065, EWL1: 14.2±21.7 kg/m2). In contrast, the weight loss after the revision surgery was significant (p=0.001, EWL2: 67.1±30 kg/m2). No significant difference was found concerning age, gender, ASA, preoperative (LAGB) weight, and mean interval between LAGB and revision comparing patients with major ED (IV) to patients with milder forms (ED I-III).

Conclusion: ED is a serious long-term complication after LAGB and seems to prevent effective weight loss in stage IV. Furthermore, untreated dilation could cause long-term damage to the esophagus. Therefore, we suggest routine radiographic follow-up after LAGB even in asymptomatic patients and a treatment based on a classification with an early surgical revision for major ED.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Obes Surg. 2005 Jan;15(1):106-13 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2009 Jul;19(7):905-14 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2010 Dec;20(12):1617-26 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2004 Mar;14(3):407-14 - PubMed
    1. J Obes. 2011;2011:128451 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms