Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012
- PMID: 25809209
- PMCID: PMC4484795
- DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0567-7
Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012
Abstract
Purpose: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) enrolls asymptomatic women for cancer screening and symptomatic women for diagnostic services. This study describes the results of mammograms provided by the NBCCEDP, by examination indication (screening or diagnostic), and by age group.
Methods: For the first NBCCEDP-funded mammogram received during 2009-2012, we calculated age-specific percentages of abnormal findings, rates of follow-up testing, and invasive and in situ breast cancer diagnoses per 1,000 mammograms. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for each of these outcomes by examination indication.
Results: The NBCCEDP provided 941,649 screening, 175,310 diagnostic, and 30,434 unknown indication mammograms to 1,147,393 women. The percentage with abnormal mammograms was higher for diagnostic mammograms (40.1 %) than for screening mammograms (15.5 %). Compared with women aged 40-49 years, fewer women aged 50-64 years had abnormal results for screening (13.7 vs. 19.7 %) and diagnostic mammograms (37.7 vs. 42.7 %). Follow-up rates per 1,000 mammograms were lower among women aged 50-64 compared to those aged 40-49 (screening: 143.9 vs. 207.5; diagnostic: 645.3 vs. 760.9); biopsy rates exhibited a similar pattern (screening: 24.1 vs. 32.9; diagnostic: 167.7 vs. 169.7). For screening mammograms, older women had more cancers detected than younger women (invasive: 3.6 vs. 2.2; in situ: 2.3 vs. 2.0). Similarly, for diagnostic mammograms, cancer detection was higher for older women (invasive: 67.8 vs. 36.6; in situ: 17.4 vs. 11.1).
Conclusions: Abnormal mammograms and diagnostic follow-up procedures were less frequent in women aged 50-64 years compared to women aged 40-49 years, while breast cancer detection was higher, regardless of indication for the mammogram. Some of these differences between age groups were greater for screening mammograms than for diagnostic mammograms. Cancer detection rates were higher for diagnostic mammograms compared with screening mammograms. These findings support the NBCCEDP's priority of serving women aged 50-64 years and providing both screening and diagnostic mammograms.
Similar articles
-
Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Feb;17(1):29-38. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-4558-y. Cancer Causes Control. 2006. PMID: 16411050
-
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14570948
-
Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211974. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1974. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33764423 Free PMC article.
-
The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):97-104. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.1.9423608. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998. PMID: 9423608
-
Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. PMID: 26866210 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Time to Diagnostic Evaluation After Mammographic Screening in an Urban Setting.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Dec;25(12):1225-1230. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5661. Epub 2016 May 16. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016. PMID: 27182625 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998-2012.Cancer Causes Control. 2015 May;26(5):657-68. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0553-0. Epub 2015 Mar 17. Cancer Causes Control. 2015. PMID: 25779379 Free PMC article.
-
Forward. The reach and health impacts of the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program.Cancer Causes Control. 2015 May;26(5):649-50. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0561-0. Epub 2015 Mar 21. Cancer Causes Control. 2015. PMID: 25794898 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Preventing premature deaths from breast and cervical cancer among underserved women in the United States: insights gained from a national cancer screening program.Cancer Causes Control. 2015 May;26(5):805-9. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0541-4. Epub 2015 Mar 18. Cancer Causes Control. 2015. PMID: 25783456 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of Cancer Screening Data into Routine Cancer Surveillance Systems: A Florida Pilot Project.J Registry Manag. 2022 Winter;49(4):132-138. J Registry Manag. 2022. PMID: 37260814 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ryerson AB, Benard VB, Major AC. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: 1991–2002 National Report. US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta: 2005.
-
- U. S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716–726 W-236. - PubMed
-
- Eheman CR, Benard VB, Blackman D, et al. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:29–38. - PubMed
-
- May DS, Lee NC, Nadel MR, Henson RM, Miller DS. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:97–104. - PubMed
-
- United States Department of Agriculture Economic research service measuring rurality: rural–urban continuum codes. 2003.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical