Voice outcomes following endolaryngeal surgery; are we achieving our aims?

Abstract

Objective: To determine voice outcomes in endolaryngeal surgery.

Methods: Prospective assessment of patients undergoing endolaryngeal surgery in one head and neck team in North Glasgow from 2007 to 2014. Each patient completed a VoiSS (the Voice Symptom Scale) questionnaire at pre-assessment and post-endolaryngeal surgery. Per-operatively, the aim of the procedure was recorded from a choice of seven options in addition to the clinical conditions and the procedure.

Results: One thousand and sixty-six patient episodes were recorded. Thirty-two had incomplete data at pre-assessment and were excluded. Of the remainder, 703 (68%) had complete paired data sets. 'To improve voice' (n = 169, 24%) and 'to achieve a biopsy with no deterioration in voice' (n = 185, 26%) categories had significant outcomes in keeping with the operative aims.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that it is possible to assess patient reported voice outcomes in universal heterogeneous endolaryngeal surgery cohort over a prolonged period. The voice outcomes were in keeping with the stated aims of the endolaryngeal surgical procedures.