Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic lesions
- PMID: 25812658
- PMCID: PMC4357401
- DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2014.10.26
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic lesions
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) is currently the most commonly used procedure for obtaining cytologic specimens of the pancreas. It is accurate, minimally invasive, safe and cost-effective. However, there is discrepancy between cytological and surgical diagnoses. This study was aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAC of the pancreas.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 191 cases of pancreatic lesions initially diagnosed by EUS-FNAC with subsequent histological diagnosis between 2010 and 2012 in the Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital. Cytologic and surgical diagnoses were categorized into five groups: negative, benign, atypical, malignant, and insufficient for diagnosis. Subsequently, 167 cases with satisfactory yield in both surgical and cytology specimens were statistically analyzed to determine correlations with diagnosis.
Results: In comparison to surgical diagnoses, cytologic diagnoses were true-positive in 103 cases (61.7%), true-negative in 28 cases (16.8%), false-positive in 9 cases (5.4%), and false-negative in 27 cases (16.1%). The diagnostic accuracy was 78.4%, sensitivity was 79.2%, and specificity was 75.7%. The positive predictive value was 92.0%, and negative predictive value was 50.9%.
Conclusions: EUS-FNAC has high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. Overcoming the limitations of EUS-FNAC will make it a useful and reliable diagnostic tool for accurate evaluation of pancreatic lesions.
Keywords: Accuracy; Diagnosis; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology; Pancreas.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fine-needle aspiration: potential pitfalls in one institution's experience of 1212 procedures.Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 Feb;123(2):98-107. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21497. Epub 2014 Nov 19. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015. PMID: 25410732
-
Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma.Cancer. 2003 Oct 25;99(5):285-92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11643. Cancer. 2003. PMID: 14579295 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: A single-center analysis.Int J Med Sci. 2020 Oct 16;17(17):2861-2868. doi: 10.7150/ijms.48882. eCollection 2020. Int J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 33162814 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology - An overview.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(5):743-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.05.006. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19744637 Review.
-
The frequency and cancer risk associated with the atypical cytologic diagnostic category in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis and argument for a Bethesda System for Reporting Cytopathology of the Pancreas.Cancer Cytopathol. 2013 Nov;121(11):620-8. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21337. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013. PMID: 23881871 Review.
Cited by
-
Single Cell RNA Sequencing: A New Frontier in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 22;14(19):4589. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194589. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36230515 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles: emerging biomarkers and therapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosis/prognosis and treatment.J Nanobiotechnology. 2022 Oct 14;20(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01641-0. J Nanobiotechnology. 2022. PMID: 36242076 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reshaping preoperative treatment of pancreatic cancer in the era of precision medicine.Ann Oncol. 2021 Feb;32(2):183-196. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 26. Ann Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33248227 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting Factors for Pancreatic Malignancy with Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Chronic Pancreatitis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 15;12(4):1004. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12041004. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35454052 Free PMC article.
-
Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1448-1460. doi: 10.1177/2050640618808157. Epub 2018 Oct 19. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018. PMID: 30574315 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Matsumoto K, Takeda Y, Harada K, Horie Y, Yashima K, Murawaki Y. Effect of pancreatic juice cytology and/or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for pancreatic tumor. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:223–7. - PubMed
-
- Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–31. - PubMed
-
- Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I, Saito Y. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2011;23 Suppl 1:29–33. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources