Mitochondrial and plastid genome architecture: Reoccurring themes, but significant differences at the extremes
- PMID: 25814499
- PMCID: PMC4547224
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422049112
Mitochondrial and plastid genome architecture: Reoccurring themes, but significant differences at the extremes
Abstract
Mitochondrial and plastid genomes show a wide array of architectures, varying immensely in size, structure, and content. Some organelle DNAs have even developed elaborate eccentricities, such as scrambled coding regions, nonstandard genetic codes, and convoluted modes of posttranscriptional modification and editing. Here, we compare and contrast the breadth of genomic complexity between mitochondrial and plastid chromosomes. Both organelle genomes have independently evolved many of the same features and taken on similar genomic embellishments, often within the same species or lineage. This trend is most likely because the nuclear-encoded proteins mediating these processes eventually leak from one organelle into the other, leading to a high likelihood of processes appearing in both compartments in parallel. However, the complexity and intensity of genomic embellishments are consistently more pronounced for mitochondria than for plastids, even when they are found in both compartments. We explore the evolutionary forces responsible for these patterns and argue that organelle DNA repair processes, mutation rates, and population genetic landscapes are all important factors leading to the observed convergence and divergence in organelle genome architecture.
Keywords: chloroplast; endosymbiosis; mitochondrial genome; mitochondrion; plastid genome.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Green BR. Chloroplast genomes of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Plant J. 2011;66(1):34–44. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
