Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 12:6:181.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00181. eCollection 2015.

Judgment of musical emotions after cochlear implantation in adults with progressive deafness

Affiliations

Judgment of musical emotions after cochlear implantation in adults with progressive deafness

Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

While cochlear implantation is rather successful in restoring speech comprehension in quiet environments (Nimmons et al., 2008), other auditory tasks, such as music perception, can remain challenging for implant users. Here, we tested how patients who had received a cochlear implant (CI) after post-lingual progressive deafness perceive emotions in music. Thirteen adult CI recipients with good verbal comprehension (dissyllabic words ≥70%) and 13 normal hearing participants matched for age, gender, and education listened to 40 short musical excerpts that selectively expressed fear, happiness, sadness, and peacefulness ( Vieillard et al., 2008). The participants were asked to rate (on a 0-100 scale) how much the musical stimuli expressed these four cardinal emotions, and to judge their emotional valence (unpleasant-pleasant) and arousal (relaxing-stimulating). Although CI users performed above chance level, their emotional judgments (mean correctness scores) were generally impaired for happy, scary, and sad, but not for peaceful excerpts. CI users also demonstrated deficits in perceiving arousal of musical excerpts, whereas rating of valence remained unaffected. The current findings indicate that judgments of emotional categories and dimensions of musical excerpts are not uniformly impaired after cochlear implantation. These results are discussed in relation to the relatively spared abilities of CI users in perceiving temporal (rhythm and metric) as compared to spectral (pitch and timbre) musical dimensions, which might benefit the processing of musical emotions (Cooper et al., 2008).

Keywords: acquired deafness; arousal; cochlear implant; emotion; music; valence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mean correct scores of the two groups of participants (NH, normal hearing controls; CI, cochlear implanted users) as a function of the four intended emotions (bars represent the SE of the mean). Asterisk means significant difference.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean ratings of the two groups of participants in judging valence of musical excerpts as a function of the intended emotions and groups (NH, normal hearing controls; CI, cochlear implanted users; bars represent the SE of the mean).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean ratings of the two groups of participants in judging arousal of musical excerpts as a function of the intended emotions and groups (NH, normal hearing controls; CI, cochlear implanted users; bars represent the SE of the mean).

References

    1. Bigand E., Vieillard S., Madurell F., Marozeau J., Dacquet A. (2005). Multidimensional scaling of emotional responses to music: the effect of musical expertise, and of the duration of the excerpts. Cogn. Emot. 19 1113–1139 10.1080/02699930500204250 - DOI
    1. Brockmeier S. J., Fitzgerald D., Searle O., Fitzgerald H., Grasmeder M., Hilbig S., et al. (2011). The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int. 12 10–20 10.1179/146701010X12677899497236 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunswick E. (1957). “Scope and aspects of the cognitive problem,” in Contemporary Approaches to Cognition, eds Gruber H., Hammond K. R., Jessor R. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; ), 5–31.
    1. Carlyon R. P., Monstrey J., Deeks J. M., Macherey O. (2014). Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses. Int. J. Audiol. 53 871–879 10.3109/14992027.2014.932024 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper W. B., Tobey E., Loizou P. C. (2008). Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal battery for evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear. 29 618–626 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources