Cost Effectiveness of Routine Duodenal Biopsy Analysis for Celiac Disease During Endoscopy for Gastroesophageal Reflux
- PMID: 25818076
- PMCID: PMC4509941
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.022
Cost Effectiveness of Routine Duodenal Biopsy Analysis for Celiac Disease During Endoscopy for Gastroesophageal Reflux
Abstract
Background & aims: Some patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) actually have undiagnosed celiac disease. These patients often undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to determine the etiology and severity of GERD. Performing routine duodenal biopsy analysis during an EGD could identify patients with celiac disease. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of this approach.
Methods: We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE database to identify publications through March 2014 on patients who underwent a duodenal biopsy analysis during an EGD for GERD. Data collected were used to construct a decision tree to calculate the cost effectiveness of an EGD with and without celiac disease tests.
Results: Among 10,000 patients with refractory GERD who underwent an EGD, we predicted a biopsy strategy would detect 70% of patients with celiac disease if the prevalence of celiac disease was 1% in this cohort. Biopsy analysis at the start of the EGD procedure would increase the remaining quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.0032, and increase the lifetime cost by $389/patient. Compared with no biopsy, the biopsy strategy cost $55,692.86/case of celiac disease detected, and $121,875/QALY gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the biopsy strategy met the threshold of less than $50,000/QALY when 1 of the following parameters was met: when the utility of living with GERD was less than 0.88, when the prevalence of celiac disease in patients with refractory GERD was greater than 1.8%, when biopsy analysis detected celiac disease with more than 98.1% specificity, when the cost of a gluten-free diet was less than $645.85/y, or if the cost of proton pump inhibitor therapy was more than $5874.01/y.
Conclusions: Based on base-case values, it is not cost effective to perform a biopsy analysis to detect celiac disease in patients undergoing an EGD for refractory GERD. However, the approach becomes cost effective when the prevalence of celiac disease in this population is 1.8% or greater.
Keywords: Antibody; ICER; PPI; Screening.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness model of endoscopic biopsy for eosinophilic esophagitis in patients with refractory GERD.Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug;106(8):1439-45. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.94. Epub 2011 Mar 29. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21448144
-
Cost effectiveness of routine duodenal biopsies in iron deficiency anemia.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 14;22(34):7813-23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7813. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27678365 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in changing treatment outcome in refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;57(1):124-130. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1988141. Epub 2021 Oct 20. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 34669534
-
Adequacy of EGD Reporting: a Review of 100 Reports from 100 Endoscopists.J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May;25(5):1117-1123. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04634-2. Epub 2020 Jun 30. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021. PMID: 32607854 Review.
-
The Second Canadian Consensus Conference on the Management of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Can J Gastroenterol. 1997 Sep;11 Suppl B:7B-20B. Can J Gastroenterol. 1997. PMID: 9347173 Review.
Cited by
-
A self-reported symptom-based decision-making model helps to rule out outpatient cases at low risk for CRC before colonoscopy.Heliyon. 2024 Jun 25;10(13):e33619. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33619. eCollection 2024 Jul 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39091940 Free PMC article.
-
Duodenal Bulb Biopsies Remain Relevant in the Diagnosis of Adult Celiac Disease.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;14(11):1589-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27565522 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Burden of Celiac Disease.Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan;37(1):45-61. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0707-5. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019. PMID: 30221333
-
Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost-efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre-endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway.Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Feb;22(2):121-124. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1756-7. Epub 2018 Feb 23. Tech Coloproctol. 2018. PMID: 29476446 Free PMC article.
-
Rates of Duodenal Biopsy During Upper Endoscopy Differ Widely Between Providers: Implications for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;53(2):e61-e67. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000957. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 29095420 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1731–43. - PubMed
-
- Reilly NR, Green PH. Epidemiology and clinical presentations of celiac disease. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34:473–8. - PubMed
-
- Dydensborg S, Toftedal P, Biaggi M, et al. Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease in Denmark: a linkage study combining national registries. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:179–84. - PubMed
-
- Lohi S, Mustalahti K, Kaukinen K, et al. Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1217–25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous