Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;103(4):243-54.
doi: 10.1002/bdra.23340. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and major structural birth defects

Affiliations

Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and major structural birth defects

Hyeyeun Lim et al. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Ionizing radiation (IR) is known to be carcinogenic and mutagenic, but little is known about the association between maternal occupational exposure to IR and birth defects.

Methods: We studied 38,009 mothers who participated in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study and delivered between 1997 and 2009. We assessed odds ratios [ORs] for the association between maternal occupations with potential exposure to IR and 39 birth defects.

Results: We observed significant odds ratios (ORs) for isolated hydrocephaly (adjusted OR [AOR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.2), isolated anotia/microtia (AOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.0), isolated colonic atresia (crude OR, 7.5; 95% CI, 2.5-22.3), isolated omphalocele (AOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.6) and isolated anencephaly (crude OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.94). We also observed a nonsignificant OR for birth defects in aggregate (AOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 0.9-4.6) among mothers with potential occupational exposure to fluoroscopy.

Conclusion: We assessed 39 birth defects, observing that maternal occupations with potential exposure to IR were associated with a significantly increased risk for 4 birth defects and a significantly protected risk for 1 birth defect. These results should be interpreted cautiously because our measurement of exposure is qualitative, some of these associations may be due to occupational exposures that are correlated with IR and some may be due to chance. However, these findings serve as the first evaluation of these relationships in a large study and may be useful for generating hypotheses for future studies.

Keywords: anencephaly; anotia; birth defects; colon atresia; fluoroscopy; hydrocephalus; ionizing radiation; occupational; omphalocele.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. [Accessed on November 11, 2014];Annual reports on occupational radiation exposure in Canada. 2008 Retrieved from: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/occup-travail/index-eng.php.
    1. Bailey S. Air crew radiation exposure-an overview. Nucl News. 2000;43:32–40.
    1. Bhatti P, Yong LC, Doody MM, et al. Diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased chromosome translocations: evidence from three studies. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010;49:685–692. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brisson C, Vezina M, Bernard PM, et al. Validity of occupational histories obtained by interview with female workers. Am J Ind Med. 1991;19:523–530. - PubMed
    1. Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, et al. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:826–834. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts