Advances in ultrasound imaging for congenital malformations during early gestation
- PMID: 25820190
- PMCID: PMC4398609
- DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23353
Advances in ultrasound imaging for congenital malformations during early gestation
Abstract
Background: With refinement in ultrasound technology, detection of fetal structural abnormalities has improved and there have been detailed reports of the natural history and expected outcomes for many anomalies. The ability to either reassure a high-risk woman with normal intrauterine images or offer comprehensive counseling and offer options in cases of strongly suspected lethal or major malformations has shifted prenatal diagnoses to the earliest possible gestational age.
Methods: When indicated, scans in early gestation are valuable in accurate gestational dating. Stricter sonographic criteria for early nonviability guard against unnecessary intervention. Most birth defects are without known risk factors, and detection of certain malformations is possible in the late first trimester.
Results: The best time for a standard complete fetal and placental scan is 18 to 20 weeks. In addition, certain soft anatomic markers provide clues to chromosomal aneuploidy risk. Maternal obesity and multifetal pregnancies are now more common and further limit early gestation visibility.
Conclusion: Other advanced imaging techniques during early gestation in select cases of suspected malformations include fetal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Keywords: aneuploidy; early ultrasonography; malformations; nonviability; prenatal diagnosis.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors of this manuscript have any conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
[Ultrasound screening and diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities between 11-14 gestational weeks].Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2004;43(3):3-10. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2004. PMID: 15341249 Bulgarian.
-
Fetal postmortem imaging: an overview of current techniques and future perspectives.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):493-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.034. Epub 2020 May 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32376319 Review.
-
Fetal karyotyping after 28 weeks of gestation for late ultrasound findings in a low risk population.Prenat Diagn. 2003 Dec 30;23(13):1068-72. doi: 10.1002/pd.715. Prenat Diagn. 2003. PMID: 14691994
-
[The advantages of early midtrimester targeted fetal systematic organ screening for the detection of fetal anomalies--will a global change start in Israel?].Harefuah. 2014 Jun;153(6):320-4, 368. Harefuah. 2014. PMID: 25095602 Hebrew.
-
[Prenatal diagnosis of developmental congenital malformations--the limitations of ultrasound scanning].Harefuah. 2003 Apr;142(4):287-92, 317, 316. Harefuah. 2003. PMID: 12754880 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Prenatal detection and management challenges of a huge cystic hygroma of the neck in a resource-constraint setting: A case report.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Jul;120:109826. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109826. Epub 2024 May 28. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38843624 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic and prognostic role of soft ultrasound markers in prenatal detection and assessment of foetal abnormalities.Prz Menopauzalny. 2024 Jun;23(2):94-108. doi: 10.5114/pm.2024.141092. Epub 2024 Jul 4. Prz Menopauzalny. 2024. PMID: 39391522 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations.Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 12;2022:7082832. doi: 10.1155/2022/7082832. eCollection 2022. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022. PMID: 35866037 Free PMC article.
-
Insights into Congenital Body Stalk Anomaly Coupled with Placenta Accreta Conditions: A Case Report.Am J Case Rep. 2025 Apr 30;26:e946041. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.946041. Am J Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40302190 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;12(3):575. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030575. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35328129 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abu-Rustum RS, Ziade MF, Abu-Rustum SE. Learning curve and factors influencing the feasibility of performing fetal echocardiography at the time of the first-trimester scan. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:695–700. - PubMed
-
- American College of Radiology Practice Guideline. ACR-SPR Practice Guideline for the Safe and Optimal Performance of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Resolution. 2010;13:1–12.
-
- ACOG Committee Opinion. First trimester screening for fetal anomalies with nuchal translucency. Number 223, October 1999. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;68:71–72. - PubMed
-
- American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1067–1082. - PubMed
-
- Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170 (1 Pt 1):32–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical