Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;36(4):227-46.
doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0391-6.

Participants' Perceptions of a Violence Prevention Curriculum for Middle School Students: Was It Relevant and Useful?

Affiliations

Participants' Perceptions of a Violence Prevention Curriculum for Middle School Students: Was It Relevant and Useful?

Albert D Farrell et al. J Prim Prev. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

School-based youth violence prevention programs, particularly those focused on middle school students, have generally had limited effects that are often not sustained over time. Although many interventions focus on teaching social-cognitive skills, few studies have explored the extent to which students master these skills, actually use them, and find them effective in dealing with problem situations. This study examined these issues based on interviews with 141 students attending one county and two urban middle schools in classrooms where the Second Step violence prevention program had been implemented. We coded interviews to assess participants' general reactions to the interventions, use of skills, and effectiveness of skills. We also asked participants to describe outcomes they experienced when they used specific skills taught in the intervention in response to problem situations. Participants had generally positive reactions to the intervention. Their suggestions for improving the intervention primarily concerned improving its relevance. Participants described changes they had made based on the intervention, particularly controlling anger and improving relations with others. Their responses indicated that they sometimes misunderstood or misused specific intervention skills, especially problem solving and empathy. Students' descriptions of the outcomes they experienced when using intervention skills were not uniformly positive. This was especially true for situations involving peers such as peer pressure and bullying. These results underscore the need for more intensive efforts to ensure that students master intervention skills and are able to use them correctly. In addition, interventions should address the broader social context (e.g., peers, school) to maximize the effectiveness of skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentage of participants who reported using each intervention skill. Figure includes the percentage of those whose descriptions indicated that they did not use the skill correctly. N = 141.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage of participants using each skill who identified one or more outcome related to achieving desired outcome, avoiding negative outcome, and experiencing negative outcome. Total N = 141. The denominator for percentages varied across skills and reflects the number of students who reported using each skill (values in parentheses).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aber JL, Jones SM, Brown JL, Chaudry N, & Samples F (1998). Resolving conflict creatively: Evaluating the developmental effects of a school-based violence prevention program in neighborhood and classroom context. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 187–213. doi: 10.1017/S0954579498001576 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berkel C, Mauricio A Schoenfelder E, & Sandler I (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0186-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosworth K, Espelage D, DuBay T, Daytner G, & Karageorge K (2000). Preliminary evaluation of a multimedia prevention program for adolescents. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24, 268–280.
    1. Boxer P, & Dubow EF (2002). A social-cognitive information-processing model for school-based aggression reduction and prevention programs: Issues for research and practice. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 10, 177–192. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.24.4.3 - DOI
    1. Brown JA, Jimerson SR, Dowdy E, Gonzalez V, & Stewart K (2012). Assessing the effects of school-wide Second Step implementation in a predominantly English language learner, low SES, Latino sample. Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 864–875. doi: 10.1002/pits.21639 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms