Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Jul;17(4):881-90.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9750-8. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

Modeling and Simulation to Support Phase 2 Dose Selection for RG7652, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Modeling and Simulation to Support Phase 2 Dose Selection for RG7652, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody Against Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9

Nageshwar R Budha et al. AAPS J. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

RG7652 is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody targeting human PCSK9, a regulator of serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) levels. RG7652 prevents degradation of the hepatic LDLc receptors by blocking PCSK9 binding and thereby resulting in efficient LDLc uptake by hepatocytes. The pharmacokinetics of RG7652 have been evaluated in healthy subjects after single and multiple subcutaneous doses. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models were developed to explain the antibody PK and LDLc time course data. The PK and PD models based on data from healthy subjects were used to simulate the effects of RG7652 on LDLc levels for a range of potential dose regimens in patients with coronary heart disease. A one-compartment PK model combined with an indirect PD response model was able to adequately describe the PK and LDLc data. Simulations of 400 mg every 4 weeks or 800 mg every 8 weeks regimens show significant LDLc reduction and suggest that dosing RG7652 once every month or once every 2 months is predicted to be optimal for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The PK and PD model successfully described the PK and LDLc data from healthy subjects in a Phase 1 study, and the model-based simulations provided useful insights and quantitative understanding for the selection of Phase 2 study doses in patients with coronary heart disease. The approach used in the case study demonstrates the utility of modeling and simulation in designing dose-ranging studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean (+/− standard deviation) serum RG7652 concentration versus time (left panels) and LDLc (direct method) change from baseline versus time (right panels) after single dose (top panels) and multiple doses (bottom panels) of RG7652 in the Phase 1 study. The points and the error bars represent the mean and standard deviation (RG7652 serum concentration) or standard error (LDLc change from baseline). The lines represent the mean of model predicted concentrations. SD single dose, QWx4 once weekly for 4 weeks, QWx4 + A once weekly for 4 weeks on atorvastatin treatment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of the PK and PD models used to describe serum RG7652 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (LDLc) data. SC subcutaneous space
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of baseline LDLc on E max parameter in the population PD model. Circles and triangles represent individual Phase 1 subjects in the nonstatin and statin cohorts, respectively. Solid gray line indicates loess smoother
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Predicted mean LDLc change from baseline at 24 weeks versus milligrams of RG7652 dose per 4 weeks (left panel) and predicted % subjects with nadir LDLc < 15 mg/dL (right panel) at three regimens
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Predicted serum LDLc profiles for simulated Phase 2 trials using the population PD model. The solid black line indicates the mean of 100 simulated trials and the gray band indicates the 90% prediction intervals. The dotted gray line indicates 50 mg/dL reduction in LDLc from baseline. Upper: predicted profiles for Q4W regimens. Middle: predicted profiles for the Q8W regimens. Lower: predicted profiles for Q12W regimens

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conti CR. Evolution of NCEP guidelines: ATP1-ATPIII risk estimation for coronary heart disease in 2002 National Cholesterol Education Program. Clin Cardiol. 2002;25(3):89–90. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960250302. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143-421. - PubMed
    1. Sniderman A, Thanassoulis G, Couture P, Williams K, Alam A, Furberg CD. Is lower and lower better and better? A re-evaluation of the evidence from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration meta-analysis for low-density lipoprotein lowering. J Clin Lipidol. 2012;6(4):303–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2012.05.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pearson TA. Primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: trials of lipid lowering with statins. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(10A):28S–30. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)90428-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Udell JA, Ray JG. Primary and secondary prevention of heart failure with statins. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2006;4(6):917–26. doi: 10.1586/14779072.4.6.917. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources