Authors' reply

Affiliations

Comment

Peter Grendelmeier et al. Respiration. 2015.

. 2015;89(5):437.

doi: 10.1159/000376561. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

¹ Clinic of Pulmonary Medicine and Respiratory Cell Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

No abstract available

Comment on

Propofol versus midazolam in medical thoracoscopy: a randomized, noninferiority trial.
Grendelmeier P, Tamm M, Jahn K, Pflimlin E, Stolz D. Grendelmeier P, et al. Respiration. 2014;88(2):126-36. doi: 10.1159/000362797. Epub 2014 Jun 21. Respiration. 2014. PMID: 24968814 Clinical Trial.
The use of propofol for sedation in medical thoracoscopy.
Vorster MJ, Bruwer JW, Frank W, Bernasconi M, Koegelenberg CF. Vorster MJ, et al. Respiration. 2015;89(5):435. doi: 10.1159/000371451. Epub 2015 Feb 12. Respiration. 2015. PMID: 25676219 No abstract available.
Propofol: is it really worse than midazolam in medical thoracoscopy?
Licker M, Diaper J, Tschopp JM. Licker M, et al. Respiration. 2015;89(5):436. doi: 10.1159/000371452. Epub 2015 Feb 12. Respiration. 2015. PMID: 25676394 No abstract available.