This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 2015 Mar 30:350:h1566.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1566.

Assessment of changes to screening programmes: why randomisation is important

Katy J L Bell¹, Patrick Bossuyt², Paul Glasziou³, Les Irwig⁴

Affiliations

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Bond University, QLD 4229, Australia katy.bell@sydney.edu.au.
² AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
³ Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Bond University, QLD 4229, Australia.
⁴ Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia.

PMID: 25825377
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1566

Assessment of changes to screening programmes: why randomisation is important

Katy J L Bell et al. BMJ. 2015.

. 2015 Mar 30:350:h1566.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1566.

Authors

Katy J L Bell¹, Patrick Bossuyt², Paul Glasziou³, Les Irwig⁴

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Bond University, QLD 4229, Australia katy.bell@sydney.edu.au.
² AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
³ Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice, Bond University, QLD 4229, Australia.
⁴ Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia.

PMID: 25825377
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1566

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- HighWire
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.