Evaluation of the filling ability of artificial lateral canals using calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers and two gutta-percha filling techniques
- PMID: 25827199
- DOI: 10.1111/iej.12454
Evaluation of the filling ability of artificial lateral canals using calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers and two gutta-percha filling techniques
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the ability of a calcium silicate-based sealer (iRoot SP) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (Topseal) using two gutta-percha filling techniques to fill artificial lateral canals (ALCs).
Methodology: Seventy single-rooted human teeth were selected. Ten of these were used to obtain pilot data. Three ALCs were produced on mesial and distal surfaces of each root, one in each third, using size 10 engine reamers. The roots were randomly assigned to four experimental groups according to the filling technique and sealer used: 1, cold gutta-percha (single-point technique) with iRoot SP (SP-iR); 2, cold gutta-percha (single-point technique) with Topseal (SP-T); 3, continuous wave of condensation technique with iRoot SP (CWC-iR); and 4, continuous wave of condensation technique with Topseal (CWC-T). Digital periapical radiographs were taken. After the sealer had set, the roots were demineralized, cleared in methyl-salicylate and examined under a stereomicroscope. The depth of penetration of sealer and/or gutta-percha into the ALC was scored using a 5-point system, conducting an analysis on four surfaces. Filling scores of 0-1 were considered not acceptable, whilst scores of 2-4 were considered acceptable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare the experimental groups (P < 0.05).
Results: CWC-T was associated with the highest acceptable filling (57.8%), followed by CWC-iR (53.3%), SP-T (48.9%) and SP-iR (36.7%). Only when SP-iR was compared to the other groups, was the difference significant (P < 0.05). The apical third was associated with the lowest acceptable filling (37.5%). It was followed, in ascending order, by the middle (51.6%) and coronal thirds (58.3%). These differences were significant only when the apical thirds were compared to the other root thirds (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The calcium silicate-based sealer with continuous wave of condensation was more effective in artificial filling lateral canals than the single-point technique. The epoxy resin-based sealer with both filling techniques was effective in artificial filling lateral canals.
Keywords: Topseal; artificial lateral canal; filling technique; gutta-percha; iRoot SP; sealer.
© 2015 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-Point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne.Int Endod J. 2016 Apr;49(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/iej.12455. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Int Endod J. 2016. PMID: 25827240
-
Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Clin Oral Investig. 2018 May;22(4):1631-1639. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2216-x. Epub 2017 Oct 27. Clin Oral Investig. 2018. PMID: 29080076
-
A preliminary analysis of the morphology of lateral canals after root canal filling using a tooth-clearing technique.Int Endod J. 2003 Jan;36(1):54-63. doi: 10.1046/j.0143-2885.2003.00613.x. Int Endod J. 2003. PMID: 12656515
-
[Application status and prospect of single-cone obturation technique with bioceramic sealers].Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 9;57(4):424-429. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210831-00390. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 35368171 Review. Chinese.
-
A critical review of the material properties guiding the clinician's choice of root canal sealers.Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4147-4155. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05140-w. Epub 2023 Jul 17. Clin Oral Investig. 2023. PMID: 37460901 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, iRoot SP, and AH Plus with different obturation techniques.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):4163-4173. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03747-x. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33638051 Free PMC article.
-
Penetration of Three Endodontic Sealers in Simulated Lateral Canals during the Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study.Int J Dent. 2022 Nov 16;2022:2686247. doi: 10.1155/2022/2686247. eCollection 2022. Int J Dent. 2022. PMID: 36440093 Free PMC article.
-
Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review.Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jun 9;45(3):e35. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35. eCollection 2020 Aug. Restor Dent Endod. 2020. PMID: 32839716 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Penetration of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin Sealers Into the Lateral Canals.Int Dent J. 2024 Aug;74(4):762-768. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Feb 12. Int Dent J. 2024. PMID: 38350801 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of tricalcium silicate-based cements: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Saudi Dent J. 2024. PMID: 38419984 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources