Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Aug;4(8):1240-51.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.446. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Supportive care for men with prostate cancer: why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials

Theresa Helen Mazzarello Moore  1 , Anna Jyoti Louise King  1 , Maggie Evans  1 , Debbie Sharp  1 , Raj Persad  1 , Alyson Louise Huntley  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Supportive care for men with prostate cancer: why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials

Theresa Helen Mazzarello Moore et al. Cancer Med. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Men with prostate cancer are likely to have a long illness and experience psychological distress for which supportive care may be helpful. This systematic review describes the evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of supportive care for men with prostate cancer, taking into account treatment pathway and components of interventions. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Psychinfo were searched from inception--July 2013 for randomized controlled trials and controlled trials. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Twenty-six studies were included (2740 participants). Interventions were delivered pre and during (n = 12), short-term (n = 8), and longer term (18 months) (n = 5) after primary treatment. No interventions were delivered beyond this time. Few trials recruited ethnic minorities and none recruited men in same sex relationships. Intervention components included information, education, health professional discussion, homework, peer discussion, buddy support, cognitive behavioral therapy, cognitive restructuring, psychoeducation, Reiki and relaxation. Most interventions were delivered for 5-10 weeks. Risk of bias of trials was assessed as unclear for most domains due to lack of information. The majority of trials measuring quality of life and depression found no effect. Relatively few trials measured anxiety, coping skills and self-efficacy, and the majority found no effect. No cost data were available. Trials of supportive care for men with prostate cancer cover a range of interventions but are limited by population diversity, inconsistent measurement and reporting of outcomes, and inability to assess risk of bias. Recommendations on design and conduct of future trials are presented.

Keywords: Critical appraisal; prostate cancer; randomized controlled trials; supportive care; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C. Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. - PubMed
    1. Hsing AW, Tsao L. Devesa SS. International trends and patterns of prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int. J. Cancer. 2000;85:60–67. - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Lortet-Tieulent J, Ferlay J, Forman D. Auvinen A. Prostate cancer incidence and mortality trends in 37 European countries: an overview. Eur. J. Cancer. 2010;46:3040–3052. - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Cancer. 2014. National Institute of Cancer USA definition of supportive care . Available at http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?cdrid=46609 on the (accessed 21 July 2014)
    1. Vieira I, Burke L. Marks-Maran D. Prostate cancer follow-up needs: do patients and professionals agree? Br. J. Nurs. 2014;23:S14–S19. S12, - PubMed

Publication types