Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 1;10(4):e0122029.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122029. eCollection 2015.

Impact of nutrition and salinity changes on biological performances of green and white sturgeon

Affiliations

Impact of nutrition and salinity changes on biological performances of green and white sturgeon

Pedro G Vaz et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Green and white sturgeon are species of high conservational and economic interest, particularly in the San Francisco Bay Delta (SFBD) for which significant climate change-derived alterations in salinity and nutritional patterns are forecasted. Although there is paucity of information, it is critical to test the network of biological responses underlying the capacity of animals to tolerate current environmental changes. Through nutrition and salinity challenges, climate change will likely have more physiological effect on young sturgeon stages, which in turn may affect growth performance. In this study, the two species were challenged in a multiple-factor experimental setting, first to levels of feeding rate, and then to salinity levels for different time periods. Data analysis included generalized additive models to select predictors of growth performance (measured by condition factor) among the environmental stressors considered and a suite of physiological variables. Using structural equation modeling, a path diagram is proposed to quantify the main linkages among nutrition status, salinity, osmoregulation variables, and growth performances. Three major trends were anticipated for the growth performance of green and white sturgeon in the juvenile stage in the SFBD: (i) a decrease in prey abundance will be highly detrimental for the growth of both species; (ii) an acute increase in salinity within the limits studied can be tolerated by both species but possibly the energy spent in osmoregulation may affect green sturgeon growth within the time window assessed; (iii) the mechanism of synergistic effects of nutrition and salinity changes will be more complex in green sturgeon, with condition factor responding nonlinearly to interactions of salinity and nutrition status or time of salinity exposure. Green sturgeon merits special scientific attention and conservation effort to offset the effects of feed restriction and salinity as key environmental stressors in the SFBD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental design.
First phase (top): Four levels of one treatment, feeding rate (12.5, 25, 50, 100%). Second phase (bottom): Four levels of the treatment salinity (0, 8, 16, 24/32 ppt), and three levels of the exposure time to salinity levels (12, 72, 120 h). The experimental design was the same for the two species, except that maximum salinity was different for white (W) and green (G) sturgeon.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Standardized values (0 to 1) of biological responses to nutritional changes.
Green and white dots denote green and white sturgeon, respectively. For each biological parameter (y-axis), fishes were challenged with four levels of feeding rate (12.5, 25, 50, 100%; right y-axis). Three observations were collected per FR level per species.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Generalized additive model fits and 95% confidence intervals from the optimal model for green sturgeon.
Relationships between growth performance of juvenile green sturgeon, measured by condition factor, and each explanatory variable (FR × salinity interaction, time × salinity interaction, pyloric ceca NKA, and muscle moisture). Sturgeons were challenged in a multiple-factor setting, first to levels of feeding rate (12.5, 25, 50, 100%), and then to salinity levels (0, 8, 16, 32 ppt) for a given time (12, 72, 120 h). W = weight; L = length.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Generalized additive model fits and 95% confidence intervals from the optimal model for white sturgeon.
Relationships between growth performance, measured by condition factor, and each explanatory variable are illustrated. Sturgeons were challenged in a multiple-factor setting, first to levels of feeding rate (12.5, 25, 50, 100%), and then to salinity levels (0, 8, 16, 24 ppt) for a given time (12, 72, 120 h). Only feeding rate and time were kept in the final model. W = weight; L = length.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Fitted structural equation model for green sturgeon.
Bayesian estimation was used to determine variables affecting condition factor (double-line rectangle). Solid rectangles: treatments; dashed rectangles: osmoregulation parameters. Arrows represent causal pathways between variables, each having a standardized partial regression coefficient (sign indicates whether the relationship is positive or negative for that direct effect).
Fig 6
Fig 6. Schematic overview of the primary results.
The main relationships among the principal variables identified in this study are summarized as affecting directly or indirectly the growth performance of green and white juvenile sturgeon when challenged with levels of their feeding rate, salinity, and exposure time to salinity. Solid circles: treatments; dashed circles: osmoregulation parameters; double-line circles: growth performance measured by condition factor (CF). The sign associated with each arrow indicates whether the relationship is positive or negative for that effect. Wider arrows refer to the most significant relationships in this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sokolova IM. Energy-Limited Tolerance to Stress as a Conceptual Framework to Integrate the Effects of Multiple Stressors. Integr Comp Biol. 2013; 53: 597–608. 10.1093/icb/ict028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beatty SJ, Morgan DL, Lymbery AJ. Implications of climate change for potamodromous fishes. Glob Chang Biol. 2014; 20: 1794–1807. 10.1111/gcb.12444 - DOI - PubMed
    1. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: The Physical Sciences Basis Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
    1. Meehl GA, Washington WM, Collins WD, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Buja LE, et al. How Much More Global Warming and Sea Level Rise? Science. 2005; 307: 1769–1772. - PubMed
    1. Cloern JE, Jassby AD. Drivers of change in estuarine-coastal ecosystems: Discoveries from four decades of study in San Francisco Bay. Rev Geophys. 2012; 50: RG4001.

Publication types