Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 7;112(14):E1744-53.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406551112. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

T-cell receptor α enhancer is inactivated in αβ T lymphocytes

Affiliations

T-cell receptor α enhancer is inactivated in αβ T lymphocytes

Beatriz del Blanco et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The Tcra enhancer (Eα) is essential for Tcra locus germ-line transcription and primary Vα-to-Jα recombination during thymocyte development. We found that Eα is inhibited late during thymocyte differentiation and in αβ T lymphocytes, indicating that it is not required to drive transcription of rearranged Tcra genes. Eα inactivation resulted in the disruption of functional long-range enhancer-promoter interactions and was associated with loss of Eα-dependent histone modifications at promoter and enhancer regions, and reduced expression and recruitment of E2A to the Eα enhanceosome in T cells. Enhancer activity could not be recovered by T-cell activation, by forced expression of E2A or by the up-regulation of this and other transcription factors in the context of T helper differentiation. Our results argue that the major function of Eα is to coordinate the formation of a chromatin hub that drives Vα and Jα germ-line transcription and primary rearrangements in thymocytes and imply the existence of an Eα-independent mechanism to activate transcription of the rearranged Tcra locus in αβ T cells.

Keywords: T-cell development; T-cell receptor; enhancer; transcription.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Tcra Eα-dependent transcription is inactivated in SP thymocytes and αβ T lymphocytes. (A) Schematic representation of Tcra/Tcrd genomic structure. The V, D, and J gene segments are represented by gray vertical rectangles, and the recombination signal sequences are shown as black (containing a 23-bp spacer) or white (containing a 12-bp spacer) triangles. Positions of the TEA exon, the Vα/δ, Dδ, Jδ, and Jα gene segments, and the Cδ and Cα regions are indicated. Arrows represent active sites for germ-line transcription. Promoters and enhancers are represented as diamonds and circles, respectively. The Tcra LCR is represented as a long horizontal rectangle. (B) Analysis of TEA exon transcription in Rx5C.C7 and RxDO11.10 thymocytes and T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. (C) Analysis of proximal Vα and Jα transcription in DP thymocytes from Rxßtg and Eα−/− Rxßtg mice by RT-qPCR. (D) Analysis of TRAV17 and TRAV21 germ-line transcripts in RxDO11.10 sorted thymocyte populations and T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. (E) Analysis of Jα transcription in RxDO11.10 sorted thymocyte populations and T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. The results were normalized to those for Actb and represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate RT-qPCR from three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance between the values of the RT-qPCRs from total thymocytes vs. T lymphocytes (B), Rxßtg vs. Eα−/− Rxßtg thymocytes (C), and DP thymocytes vs. T lymphocytes (D and E) (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, and *** P < 0.0005).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Eαi is inactivated in SP thymocytes and αβ T lymphocytes. (A) Analysis of Vβ11, Vβ12, and Vβ13 transcription in EαKI Rxßtg and Rxßtg thymocytes and EαKI βtg and βtg T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. (B) Analysis of Vβ13 transcription from EαKI Rxßtg DP thymocytes, EαKI βtg and βtg sorted thymocyte populations, and EαKI βtg and βtg T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. (C) Analysis of Tcra-Cα transcription in Rxßtg DP thymocytes, sorted βtg DP thymocytes, and sorted βtg T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. The results were normalized to those for Actb and represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate RT-qPCR from three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance between the values of the RT-qPCRs from EαKI Rxßtg or EαKI βtg DP thymocytes vs. EαKI βtg CD4+ SP thymocytes and T lymphocytes (A and B) or Rxßtg DP thymocytes vs. βtg DP thymocytes or αβ T lymphocytes (C) (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, and ***P < 0.0005).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The Eα-TEAp long-range interactions present in DP thymocytes are lost in αβ T lymphocytes. 3C analysis of physical contacts between Eα and TEAp or a genomic fragment located at −75 kb from the enhancer in DP thymocytes (black bars) and αβ T lymphocytes (gray bars) from RxDO11.10. Data were normalized to the ligation frequency between Eα and a neighboring HindIII fragment (Fig. S2 and Table S1). HindIII digestion efficiency and the relative interactions between Eα and the control fragment in DP thymocytes and T lymphocytes are shown in Fig. S2. The results represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate qPCR from three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance between the values of the qPCRs obtained after ligation of HindIII fragments from DP thymocytes vs. T lymphocytes (**P < 0.005).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Comparative histone H3 modification analyses in DP thymocytes and αβ T lymphocytes. Analysis of Tcra Jα and Eα histone H3K4me1 (A), H3K4me3 (B), and H3K27ac (C) modifications in DP thymocytes and T lymphocytes from RxDO11.10 mice by qChIP. Analysis of Vβ13p and Eαi histone H3K4me1 (D), H3K4me3 (E), and H3K27ac (F) modifications in DP thymocytes from EαKI Rxßtg mice and T lymphocytes from EαKI βtg by qChIp. MageA2, negative control (49). Data represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate qPCR analysis of three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t test were used to determine the statistical significance between the values of the qChIPs from DP thymocytes vs. T lymphocytes (**P < 0.005 and ***P < 0.0005).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Eα and Eαi are not activated by TCR-mediated cell stimulation and Th differentiation in T lymphocytes. (A) Analysis of TRAV17, TRAV21, and Jα58 germ-line transcripts in sorted DP thymocytes and unstimulated and stimulated T lymphocytes from RxDO11.10 mice by RT-qPCR. (B) Analysis of Vβ13 transcription in EαKI Rxßtg thymocytes and unstimulated and stimulated EαKI βtg T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. (C) Analysis of Vβ13 transcription in EαKI Rxßtg DP thymocytes, EαKI βtg T lymphocytes, and EαKI tgβ T lymphocytes left in complete medium (unstimulated) or incubated with PMA and ionomycin (PMA + Ionomycin) by RT-qPCR. Analysis of TRAV17 (D), Jα61 (E), and Jα58 (F) transcripts present in unstimulated and in vivo stimulated RxDO11.10 T lymphocytes by RT-qPCR. Indicated transcripts were compared in T lymphocytes from noninjected mice (control), CFA-injected mice (CFA), or Ova 323–339 + CFA-injected mice (Ova + CFA). Indicated transcripts were compared in sorted CD69 and CD69+ T populations from Ova 323–339 + CFA-immunized mice. (G) Analysis of Gata3, Tcfe2a, Jα61, and Jα58 transcripts in sorted DP thymocytes, T lymphocytes, and Th0, Th1, Th2, and Th17 populations from RxDO11.10 mice by RT-qPCR. The results were normalized to those for Actb and represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate RT-qPCR from three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance between the values of the RT-qPCRs from DP thymocytes vs. T lymphocytes (A-C), from unstimulated vs. stimulated T lymphocytes (AF), and from T lymphocytes vs. DP thymocytes or Th populations (G) (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, and ***P < 0.0005).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
E2A is not present at the Eα enhanceosome assembled in αβ T lymphocytes. (A) Diagram depicts the location of the Tα1-Tα4 regions as well as the described TF binding sites. (B and C) For CTCF q ChIPs, chromatin was prepared from sorted DP and T lymphocytes from RxDO11.10 mice. For all other TF ChIPs, DP thymocyte chromatin was prepared from EαKI Rxßtg thymocytes and T lymphocyte chromatin was prepared from EαKI βtg T lymphocytes. Immunoprecipitation was performed with the indicated control (c) or specific Abs (Ab). DNA purified from the input and Ab-bound fractions was used as a template for qPCR to evaluate the presence of Eα (B) and Eαi (C). Data represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate qPCR from three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance between the values of the qChIPs from DP thymocytes vs. T lymphocytes (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, and ***P < 0.0005).
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
E47 can partially rescue specific Eα-dependent transcription in αβ T lymphocytes. (A) Forced expression of hE47 by retroviral transduction of T lymphocytes from RxDO11.10 mice induces TRAV17 transcription but not Jα61 and Jα58 transcription. (B) Forced expression of hE47 by retroviral transduction of T lymphocytes from EαKI βtg mice induces Vβ13 but not Vβ11 gene segment transcription. GFP, GFP-low, and GFP-high–transduced populations with MigR (control) or MigR-hE47 (hE47) were sorted, and the indicated transcripts were quantified by RT-qPCR. The results were normalized to those for Actb and represent the mean ± SEM of duplicate RT-qPCR from three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance between the RT-qPCR values from MigR- and MigR-hE47-transduced T lymphocytes by comparing MigR-control GFP cells with MigR-hE47 GFP cells, MigR-control GFP-low cells with MigR-hE47 GFP-low cells, and MigR-control GFP-high cells with MigR-hE47 GFP-high cells (*P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.0005).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cobb RM, Oestreich KJ, Osipovich OA, Oltz EM. Accessibility control of V(D)J recombination. Adv Immunol. 2006;91:45–109. - PubMed
    1. Rothenberg EV, Taghon T. Molecular genetics of T cell development. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:601–649. - PubMed
    1. Taghon T, Yui MA, Pant R, Diamond RA, Rothenberg EV. Developmental and molecular characterization of emerging β- and γδ-selected pre-T cells in the adult mouse thymus. Immunity. 2006;24(1):53–64. - PubMed
    1. Ciofani M, et al. Obligatory role for cooperative signaling by pre-TCR and Notch during thymocyte differentiation. J Immunol. 2004;172(9):5230–5239. - PubMed
    1. Sleckman BP, Bardon CG, Ferrini R, Davidson L, Alt FW. Function of the TCR α enhancer in αβ and γδ T cells. Immunity. 1997;7(4):505–515. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources