Disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives: new Australian privacy principles, but uniformity still elusive
- PMID: 25832164
- DOI: 10.5694/mja14.00670
Disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives: new Australian privacy principles, but uniformity still elusive
Abstract
There is growing understanding of the need for genetic information to be shared with genetic relatives in some circumstances. Since 2006, s 95AA of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cwlth) has permitted the disclosure of genetic information to genetic relatives without the patient's consent, provided that the health practitioner reasonably believes that disclosure is necessary to lessen or prevent a serious threat to the life, health or safety of the genetic relatives. Enabling guidelines were introduced in 2009. These were limited to the private sector, and excluded doctors working in the public sector at both Commonwealth and state and territory levels. Privacy legislation was amended in March 2014, and new Australian Privacy Principles, which replace the National Privacy Principles and Information Privacy Principles, now cover the collection and use of personal information. The Privacy Act and the Australian Privacy Principles now extend to practitioners employed by the Commonwealth but not to health practitioners working in state and territory public hospitals. In this article, I review these legislative developments and highlight the implications of the lack of uniformity and the consequent need for a collaborative, uniform approach by states and territories.
Similar articles
-
Disclosure of genetic information to at-risk relatives: recent amendments to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cwlth).Med J Aust. 2007 Oct 1;187(7):398-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01311.x. Med J Aust. 2007. PMID: 17908004
-
Disclosure to genetic relatives without consent - Australian genetic professionals' awareness of the health privacy law.BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Feb 4;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0451-1. BMC Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32019532 Free PMC article.
-
Australian reforms enabling disclosure of genetic information to genetic relatives by health practitioners.J Law Med. 2013 Sep;21(1):217-34. J Law Med. 2013. PMID: 24218794
-
Disclosing genetic information to family members without consent: Five Australian case studies.Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Nov;63(11):104035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104035. Epub 2020 Aug 14. Eur J Med Genet. 2020. PMID: 32805446 Review.
-
Genetic privacy.Annu Rev Med. 2003;54:393-407. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152131. Epub 2001 Dec 3. Annu Rev Med. 2003. PMID: 12525680 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinicians' discretion to contact patients' at-risk relatives about their genetic risk: new guidance from Australia's privacy regulator provides timely clarification.Med J Aust. 2025 Aug 4;223(3):123-126. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52712. Epub 2025 Jul 13. Med J Aust. 2025. PMID: 40652395 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Who has the responsibility to inform relatives at risk of hereditary cancer? A population-based survey in Sweden.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e089237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089237. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39609027 Free PMC article.
-
Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families.Fam Cancer. 2024 Jun;23(2):177-186. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00375-2. Epub 2024 Mar 28. Fam Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38548926 Free PMC article.
-
Practical Aspects in Genetic Testing for Cardiomyopathies and Channelopathies.Clin Biochem Rev. 2019 Nov;40(4):187-200. doi: 10.33176/AACB-19-00030. Clin Biochem Rev. 2019. PMID: 31857740 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinician-Stakeholders' Perspectives on Using Patient Portals to Return Lynch Syndrome Screening Results.J Genet Couns. 2018 Apr;27(2):349-357. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0179-3. Epub 2017 Nov 21. J Genet Couns. 2018. PMID: 29159545 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources