Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;125(2):179-192.
doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK

Affiliations

Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK

Peter Scarborough et al. Clim Change. 2014.

Abstract

The production of animal-based foods is associated with higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than plant-based foods. The objective of this study was to estimate the difference in dietary GHG emissions between self-selected meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Subjects were participants in the EPIC-Oxford cohort study. The diets of 2,041 vegans, 15,751 vegetarians, 8,123 fish-eaters and 29,589 meat-eaters aged 20-79 were assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Comparable GHG emissions parameters were developed for the underlying food codes using a dataset of GHG emissions for 94 food commodities in the UK, with a weighting for the global warming potential of each component gas. The average GHG emissions associated with a standard 2,000 kcal diet were estimated for all subjects. ANOVA was used to estimate average dietary GHG emissions by diet group adjusted for sex and age. The age-and-sex-adjusted mean (95 % confidence interval) GHG emissions in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents per day (kgCO2e/day) were 7.19 (7.16, 7.22) for high meat-eaters ( > = 100 g/d), 5.63 (5.61, 5.65) for medium meat-eaters (50-99 g/d), 4.67 (4.65, 4.70) for low meat-eaters ( < 50 g/d), 3.91 (3.88, 3.94) for fish-eaters, 3.81 (3.79, 3.83) for vegetarians and 2.89 (2.83, 2.94) for vegans. In conclusion, dietary GHG emissions in self-selected meat-eaters are approximately twice as high as those in vegans. It is likely that reductions in meat consumption would lead to reductions in dietary GHG emissions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Audsley E, Brander M, Chatterton J, Murphy-Bokern D, Webster C, Williams A. How low can we go? an assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope to reduce them by 2050. London, UK: Food Climate Research Network & WWF; 2009.
    1. Baroni L, Cenci L, Tettamanti M, Berati M. Evaluating the environmental impacts of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61:279–286. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates B, Lennox A, Prentice A, Bates C, Swan G. National diet and nutrition survey. Headline results from years 1, 2 and 3 (combined) of the rolling programme (2008/2009–2010/11) London, UK: Department of Health; 2012.
    1. Beccali M, Cellura M, Iudicello M, Mistretta M. Resource consumption and environmental impacts of the agrifood sector: life cycle assessment of Italian citrus-based products. Environ Manag. 2009;43:707–724. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9251-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker W, Welten D. Under-reporting in dietary surveys – implications for development of food-based dietary guidelines. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:683–687. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001154. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources