[Intra-tubal embryo transfer (IVF/IT-ET) in the treatment of non-tubal-induced sterility. Initial studies of the value of a new and expensive therapy procedure]
- PMID: 2583432
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1036106
[Intra-tubal embryo transfer (IVF/IT-ET) in the treatment of non-tubal-induced sterility. Initial studies of the value of a new and expensive therapy procedure]
Abstract
Intratubar embryo transfer is a form of sterility treatment, in which the in-vitro-fertilized pre-implantation embryos are transferred into the intact fallopian tube(s). This enables the benefits of in-vitro fertilization (information of the gamete fertilization behavior, specific incubation of dysmature oocytes, reduction of the polyploidy rate, risk of multiple pregnancies) to be combined with those of gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT; tubar environment for the further development of the pre-implantation embryos). Intratubar embryo transfer is indicated in cases of sterility that are not due to the fallopian tubes; in addition to idiopathic sterility, particular emphasis is put on a certain form of immunological sterility (antibodies against sperm antigens), which seems to be a special indication for this method. Intratubar embryo transfer demands a two sided approach. It is advisable to collect the oocytes transvaginally, guided by ultrasound, since general anaesthesia maybe dispensed with - if so desired. The embryo transfer itself still requires a pelviscopy, which is only performed once fertilization of the oocyte has been confirmed; which is in contrast to GIFT, in which pelviscopy is an inherent part of each treatment cycle. In spite of this advantage, intratubar embryo transfer is a method, which is associated with a high expenditure. The aim of the study was, to evaluate the success rate when all the alternative, less costly options have been exhausted. Our first results are demonstrating, that intratubar embryo transfer is successful, even as a second line therapy. Therefore the method has a significance in the treatment of sterility, not caused by the tubes and the expenditure, with which it is associated, can be justified.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
[Pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and intratubal embryo transfer].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1988 Mar;48(3):179-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035720. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1988. PMID: 3371632 German.
-
[Intra-tubal embryo transfer. A new therapy in andrologic sterility].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989 Jan;49(1):28-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035730. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989. PMID: 2917703 German.
-
Transcervical gamete and zygote intrafallopian transfer. Does it enhance pregnancy rates in an assisted reproduction program?J Reprod Med. 1996 Nov;41(11):867-70. J Reprod Med. 1996. PMID: 8951140
-
[Differential indications for surgical technics in reproductive medicine--microsurgery, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, gamete intrafallopian transfer and tubal embryo transfer].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989 May;49(5):416-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036394. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989. PMID: 2661309 Review. German.
-
GIFT, ZIFT, and related techniques.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;5(5):615-22. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8241437 Review.
Cited by
-
Down syndrome (trisomy 21) in a pregnancy after intratubal embryo transfer (IVF/IT-ET).J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990 Feb;7(1):63-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01133887. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990. PMID: 2140120 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical