Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;16(2):242-9.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24860. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

The social media index: measuring the impact of emergency medicine and critical care websites

Brent Thoma  1 , Jason L Sanders  2 , Michelle Lin  3 , Quinten S Paterson  4 , Jordon Steeg  4 , Teresa M Chan  5
Affiliations

The social media index: measuring the impact of emergency medicine and critical care websites

Brent Thoma et al. West J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The number of educational resources created for emergency medicine and critical care (EMCC) that incorporate social media has increased dramatically. With no way to assess their impact or quality, it is challenging for educators to receive scholarly credit and for learners to identify respected resources. The Social Media index (SMi) was developed to help address this.

Methods: We used data from social media platforms (Google PageRanks, Alexa Ranks, Facebook Likes, Twitter Followers, and Google+ Followers) for EMCC blogs and podcasts to derive three normalized (ordinal, logarithmic, and raw) formulas. The most statistically robust formula was assessed for 1) temporal stability using repeated measures and website age, and 2) correlation with impact by applying it to EMCC journals and measuring the correlation with known journal impact metrics.

Results: The logarithmic version of the SMi containing four metrics was the most statistically robust. It correlated significantly with website age (Spearman r=0.372; p<0.001) and repeated measures through seven months (r=0.929; p<0.001). When applied to EMCC journals, it correlated significantly with all impact metrics except number of articles published. The strongest correlations were seen with the Immediacy Index (r=0.609; p<0.001) and Article Influence Score (r=0.608; p<0.001).

Conclusion: The SMi's temporal stability and correlation with journal impact factors suggests that it may be a stable indicator of impact for medical education websites. Further study is needed to determine whether impact correlates with quality and how learners and educators can best utilize this tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Formulas used for Social Media index (SMi) calculation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cadogan M, Thoma B, Chan TM, et al. Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002–2013) Emerg Med J. 2014;31(e1):e76–7. - PubMed
    1. Brabazon T. The Google Effect: Googling, Blogging, Wikis and the Flattening of Expertise. Libri. 2006;56(3):157–167.
    1. Piwowar H. Value all research products. Nature. 2013;493(10):159. - PubMed
    1. Kritz M, Gschwandtner M, Stefanov V, et al. Utilization and perceived problems of online medical resources and search tools among different groups of European physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheverie JF, Boettcher J, Buschman J. Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library. J Sch Publ. 2009;40(3):219–230.

Publication types