Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Jul;149(1):110-118.e4.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.045. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fecal Transplantation for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial of Fecal Transplantation for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Noortje G Rossen et al. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background & aims: Several case series have reported the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed the efficacy and safety of FMT for patients with UC in a double-blind randomized trial.

Methods: Patients with mild to moderately active UC (n = 50) were assigned to groups that underwent FMT with feces from healthy donors or were given autologous fecal microbiota (control); each transplant was administered via nasoduodenal tube at the start of the study and 3 weeks later. The study was performed at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam from June 2011 through May 2014. The composite primary end point was clinical remission (simple clinical colitis activity index scores ≤2) combined with ≥1-point decrease in the Mayo endoscopic score at week 12. Secondary end points were safety and microbiota composition by phylogenetic microarray in fecal samples.

Results: Thirty-seven patients completed the primary end point assessment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 7 of 23 patients who received fecal transplants from healthy donors (30.4%) and 5 of 25 controls (20.0%) achieved the primary end point (P = .51). In the per-protocol analysis, 7 of 17 patients who received fecal transplants from healthy donors (41.2%) and 5 of 20 controls (25.0%) achieved the primary end point (P = .29). Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients (2 in the FMT group), but these were not considered to be related to the FMT. At 12 weeks, the microbiota of responders in the FMT group was similar to that of their healthy donors; remission was associated with proportions of Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa.

Conclusions: In this phase 2 trial, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission between patients with UC who received fecal transplants from healthy donors and those who received their own fecal microbiota, which may be due to limited numbers. However, the microbiota of responders had distinct features from that of nonresponders, warranting further study. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT01650038.

Keywords: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Inflammatory Bowel Disease; Randomized Controlled Trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Methodology, Not Concept of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Affects Clinical Findings.
    Cui B, Xu F, Zhang F. Cui B, et al. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):285-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.065. Epub 2015 Nov 23. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26616573 No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Ponsioen C, Zoetendal E, Rossen N, Fuentes S, de Vos W. Ponsioen C, et al. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):286-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.036. Epub 2015 Nov 23. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26616575 No abstract available.

Publication types

Associated data