Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 May;56(3):853-61.
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.853.

Mortality, length of stay, and inpatient charges for heart failure patients at public versus private hospitals in South Korea

Sun Jung Kim  1 , Eun-Cheol Park  2 , Tae Hyun Kim  3 , Ji Won Yoo  4 , Sang Gyu Lee  5
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Mortality, length of stay, and inpatient charges for heart failure patients at public versus private hospitals in South Korea

Sun Jung Kim et al. Yonsei Med J. 2015 May.

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared in-hospital mortality within 30 days of admission, lengths of stay, and inpatient charges among patients with heart failure admitted to public and private hospitals in South Korea.

Materials and methods: We obtained health insurance claims data for all heart failure inpatients nationwide between November 1, 2011 and May 31, 2012. These data were then matched with hospital-level data, and multi-level regression models were examined. A total of 8406 patients from 253 hospitals, including 31 public hospitals, were analyzed.

Results: The in-hospital mortality rate within 30 days of admission was 0.92% greater and the mean length of stay was 1.94 days longer at public hospitals than at private hospitals (mortality: 5.18% and 4.26%, respectively; LOS: 12.08 and 10.14 days, respectively). The inpatient charges were 11.4% lower per case and 24.5% lower per day at public hospitals than at private hospitals. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level confounders, public hospitals had a 1.62-fold higher in-hospital mortality rate, a 16.5% longer length of stay, and an 11.7% higher inpatient charge per case than private hospitals, although the charges of private hospitals were greater in univariate analysis.

Conclusion: We recommend that government agencies and policy makers continue to monitor quality of care, lengths of stay in the hospital, and expenditures according to type of hospital ownership to improve healthcare outcomes and reduce spending.

Keywords: Public hospitals; fees and charges; length of stay; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The difference of outcome variables between public vs. private hospitals. Data is shown as mean±SD. *Significant (p<0.001).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Thomas EJ, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Hospital ownership and preventable adverse events. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:211–219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirth RA. Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes. J Health Econ. 1999;18:219–240. - PubMed
    1. Tiemann O, Schreyögg J, Busse R. Hospital ownership and efficiency: a review of studies with particular focus on Germany. Health Policy. 2012;104:163–171. - PubMed
    1. Eggleston K, Shen YC, Lau J, Schmid CH, Chan J. Hospital ownership and quality of care: what explains the different results in the literature? Health Econ. 2008;17:1345–1362. - PubMed
    1. Fidler AH. The role of the private sector in health financing and service delivery. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19:450–451. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms