Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1989 Jan-Feb;56(1):109-14.
doi: 10.1007/BF02749720.

Supplementary iron dose in pregnancy anemia prophylaxis

Clinical Trial

Supplementary iron dose in pregnancy anemia prophylaxis

V P Reddaiah et al. Indian J Pediatr. 1989 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the optimum dose of supplemental iron for prophylaxis against pregnancy anemia. One hundred and ten pregnant women were randomly allocated to three groups: Group A receiving equivalent of 60 mg, group B 120 mg and Group C 240 mg, elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; the content of folic acid was constant in all the three groups (0.5 mg). These women had at least consumed 90 tablets in 100 +/- 10 days. Blood was drawn at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Fifty percent were anemic (less than 11 g/100 ml). The hemoglobin levels rose similarly in all groups and the differences were statistically not significant. Fifty-six percent had depleted iron stores (serum ferritin value less than 12 micrograms/l) at the beginning of the study. Following therapy a statistically significant increase in iron stores was observed in group B and C as compared to group A. The difference between group B and C was not significant. The side effects increased with increasing doses of iron; 32.4%, 40.3% and 72% in group A, B and C respectively. Based on these findings, the authors advocate that optimum dose of iron should be 120 mg instead of 60 mg as is currently being used in the National Nutritional Anemia Prophylaxis Programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1980;95:1-31 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):101-7 - PubMed
    1. Indian J Med Res. 1954 Jul;42(3):411-74 - PubMed
    1. Q J Med. 1975 Apr;44(174):241-58 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Jan;35(1):95-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources