Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;29(7):2828-42.
doi: 10.1096/fj.14-264010. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

IGF1 stimulates crypt expansion via differential activation of 2 intestinal stem cell populations

Affiliations

IGF1 stimulates crypt expansion via differential activation of 2 intestinal stem cell populations

Laurianne Van Landeghem et al. FASEB J. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) has potent trophic effects on normal or injured intestinal epithelium, but specific effects on intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are undefined. We used Sox9-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter mice that permit analyses of both actively cycling ISCs (Sox9-EGFP(Low)) and reserve/facultative ISCs (Sox9-EGFP(High)) to study IGF1 action on ISCs in normal intestine or during crypt regeneration after high-dose radiation-induced injury. We hypothesized that IGF1 differentially regulates proliferation and gene expression in actively cycling and reserve/facultative ISCs. IGF1 was delivered for 5 days using subcutaneously implanted mini-pumps in uninjured mice or after 14 Gy abdominal radiation. ISC numbers, proliferation, and transcriptome were assessed. IGF1 increased epithelial growth in nonirradiated mice and enhanced crypt regeneration after radiation. In uninjured and regenerating intestines, IGF1 increased total numbers of Sox9-EGFP(Low) ISCs and percentage of these cells in M-phase. IGF1 increased percentages of Sox9-EGFP(High) ISCs in S-phase but did not expand this population. Microarray revealed that IGF1 activated distinct gene expression signatures in the 2 Sox9-EGFP ISC populations. In vitro IGF1 enhanced enteroid formation by Sox9-EGFP(High) facultative ISCs but not Sox9-EGFP(Low) actively cycling ISCs. Our data provide new evidence that IGF1 activates 2 ISC populations via distinct regulatory pathways to promote growth of normal intestinal epithelium and crypt regeneration after irradiation.

Keywords: actively cycling ISCs; facultative/reserve ISCs; irradiation; tissue regeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
IGF1R is enriched in Sox9-EGFPLow ISCs. A) Quantitative RT-PCR for IGF1R in the 4 different FACS-isolated Sox9-EGFP cell populations. Data are expressed as means ± SEM of fold change in IGF1R gene expression relative to total (nonsorted) cells (n = 5; ANOVA; aP < 0.05 vs. total cells; bP < 0.05 vs. Sox9-EGFPNegative IECs; cP < 0.05 vs. Sox9-EGFPSublow progenitors; dP < 0.05 vs. Sox9-EGFPHigh cells). IGF1R mRNA was significantly enriched in Sox9-EGFPLow ISCs compared with other Sox9-EGFP cells, and was also expressed at higher levels in Sox9-EGFPSublow progenitors and Sox9-EGFPHigh cells vs. Sox9-EGFPNegative differentiated IECs. B) IGF1R immunoreactivity in intestinal epithelium strongly localized to the base of the crypts within the progenitor/ISC compartment. Red arrowheads show IGF1R-positive cells in the ISC zone (scale bar, 100 µm).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Five day IGF1 treatment has trophic effects in normal and regenerating intestinal epithelium. A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining in nonirradiated mice demonstrates that IGF1 induced significant changes in intestinal morphology including increased crypt density, crypt depth, and villus height (scale bar, 250 µm). B) Morphometry data were quantified on 10 zones of ∼1.5 mm spanning the entire jejunum and are expressed as means ± sem (n = 3 mice per group; n ≥ 41 villi/mouse; n ≥ 48 crypts/mouse; Student's t test; aP < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated mice). C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining at day 5 after radiation shows hyper-regenerative crypts in IGF1-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated controls (scale bar, 250 µm). D) Quantitative morphometry was performed on 20 zones of ∼1.5 mm spanning the entire jejunum and confirmed that IGF1 induced a significant increase in crypt depth after radiation (n = 3 mice per group; n ≥ 79 crypts/mouse; Student's t test; aP < 0.05 vs. vehicle-treated mice).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
IGF1 treatment preferentially expands Sox9-EGFPLow cells. A) Immunofluorescence illustrates that 5-day IGF1 therapy increased the number of Sox9-EGFPLow ISCs per crypt section in both normal (Non-Irr) and regenerating crypts (Irr) compared with vehicle (nuclei staining, DAPI, blue; Sox9-EGFP, green; scale bar, 50 µm). White arrows show Sox9-EGFPLow cells in nonirradiated crypts. White arrowheads show Sox9-EGFPHigh cells. B, C) Quantitative data are expressed as means ± sem (n = 4; Student's t test; aP < 0.05 vs. nonirradiated vehicle-treated mice; bP < 0.05 vs. nonirradiated IGF1-treated mice, cP < 0.05 vs. irradiated vehicle-treated mice). B) Quantitative analysis revealed that IGF1 significantly increased the number of Sox9-EGFPLow ISCs per crypt section in normal and regenerating crypts but did not affect the number of Sox9-EGFPHigh cells per crypt section. Thirty crypts were analyzed per animal in blinded fashion. C) Flow cytometry demonstrated that IGF1 significantly increased the proportion of Sox9-EGFPLow ISCs in both nonirradiated and irradiated regenerating crypts but did not alter percentages of Sox9-EGFPHigh and Sox9-EGFPSublow cells in either nonirradiated or irradiated intestines.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
IGF1 increases the proportion of pH3-positive Sox9-EGFPLow cells only during crypt regeneration. A) Immunofluorescence demonstrates increased number of pH3-positive cells per crypt section in IGF1-treated mice vs. vehicle-treated controls at 5 days after radiation (Irr), but no effect of IGF1 on pH3-stained cells in normal crypts (Non-Irr). White arrowheads show pH3-positive Sox9-EGFPLow cells (nuclei staining, DAPI, blue; Sox9-EGFP, green; pH3, red; scale bar, 50 µm). B, C) Quantitative data are expressed as means ± sem (n = 3; Student's t test; aP < 0.05 vs. nonirradiated vehicle-treated mice; bP < 0.05 vs. nonirradiated IGF1-treated mice, cP < 0.05 vs. irradiated vehicle-treated mice). B) Histogram shows total numbers of pH3-labeled cells per crypt section and demonstrates an increase in pH3-positive cells in regenerating crypts vs. nonirradiated controls and that IGF1 significantly enhanced this effect. Thirty crypts were studied per animal in blinded fashion. C) Histogram shows the proportion of Sox9-EGFPLow cells colabeled with pH3. IGF1 significantly increased the proportion of pH3-labeled Sox9-EGFPLow ISCs in regenerating crypts but not in nonirradiated crypts. D) Immunofluorescence illustrates that rare pH3-positive Sox9-EGFPHigh cells were only found in mice treated with IGF1 for 5 days after radiation.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
IGF1 increases proportions of EdU-positive Sox9-EGFPHigh cells but not Sox9-EGFPLow cells. A) Immunofluorescence illustrates that IGF1 increased the numbers of EdU-positive cells per crypt section at 5 days after irradiation (Irr), but not in nonirradiated controls (Non-Irr). White arrowheads show EdU-positive Sox9-EGFPHigh cells (nuclei staining, DAPI, blue; Sox9-EGFP, green; EdU, red; scale bar, 50 µm). B, C) Quantitative data are expressed as means ± sem (n = 4; Student's t test; aP < 0.05 vs. nonirradiated vehicle-treated mice; bP < 0.05 vs. nonirradiated IGF1-treated mice, cP < 0.05 vs. irradiated vehicle-treated mice). B) Histogram demonstrates that at 5 days after radiation, there was a dramatic increase in total numbers of EdU-positive cells per crypt section compared with uninjured intestine and that IGF1 further increased the total number of EdU-labeled cells per crypt section in irradiated mice. Thirty crypts were studied per animal in blinded fashion. C) Colocalization of EdU staining and Sox9-EGFP assessed the proportion of Sox9-EGFPLow and Sox9-EGFPHigh cells in S-phase. IGF1 induced no significant change in the proportion of EdU-positive Sox9-EGFPLow ISCs in either nonirradiated or irradiated regenerating crypts. IGF1 treatment significantly increased the percentages of EdU-labeled Sox9-EGFPHigh cells per crypt section in nonirradiated and regenerating crypts.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
IGF1 exerts differential impact on the gene expression profiles of the 2 Sox9-EGFP ISC populations. A and B illustrate selected mRNAs significantly regulated by IGF1 selectively/exclusively in each Sox9-EGFP ISC population isolated from uninjured small intestine (A) and at day 5 after radiation (B).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Exogenous IGF1 directly stimulates enteroid formation ability in Sox9-EGFPHigh cells but not in Sox9-EGFPLow cells. A) (Upper) Representative photographs of enteroids grown from Sox9-EGFPLow cells in absence or presence of IGF1 at 100 and 200 ng/ml at 10 days after plating (scale bar, 100 µm). (Lower) Quantitative data are expressed as means ± sem of fold change in numbers of enteroids formed from Sox9-EGFPLow cells grown in presence of IGF1 relative to numbers of enteroids formed from untreated Sox9-EGFPLow cells normalized to initial numbers of cells plated per well. Quantification of enteroid numbers demonstrated that IGF1 at 100 and 200 ng/ml did not significantly affect numbers of enteroids formed from Sox9-EGFPLow cells vs. untreated controls at 4 and 10 days after plating. B) Representative photographs of enteroids grown from Sox9-EGFPHigh cells in absence or presence of IGF1 at 100 and 200 ng/ml at 10 days after plating. In the absence of IGF1, Sox9-EGFPHigh cells yielded no enteroids. Addition of exogenous IGF1 resulted in the ability of Sox9-EGFPHigh cells to yield enteroids. IGF1 impact on enteroid formation from Sox9-EGFPHigh cells was similar at all doses of IGF1 tested.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in IGF1-induced crypt expansion. The schematic summarizes the cellular and molecular changes associated with crypt expansion induced by IGF1 therapy in uninjured intestine or during radiation-induced crypt regeneration.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hua G., Thin T. H., Feldman R., Haimovitz-Friedman A., Clevers H., Fuks Z., Kolesnick R. (2012) Crypt base columnar stem cells in small intestines of mice are radioresistant. Gastroenterology 143, 1266–1276 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Landeghem L., Santoro M. A., Krebs A. E., Mah A. T., Dehmer J. J., Gracz A. D., Scull B. P., McNaughton K., Magness S. T., Lund P. K. (2012) Activation of two distinct Sox9-EGFP-expressing intestinal stem cell populations during crypt regeneration after irradiation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 302, G1111–G1132 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yan K. S., Chia L. A., Li X., Ootani A., Su J., Lee J. Y., Su N., Luo Y., Heilshorn S. C., Amieva M. R., Sangiorgi E., Capecchi M. R., Kuo C. J. (2012) The intestinal stem cell markers Bmi1 and Lgr5 identify two functionally distinct populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 466–471 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barker N., van Oudenaarden A., Clevers H. (2012) Identifying the stem cell of the intestinal crypt: strategies and pitfalls. Cell Stem Cell 11, 452–460 - PubMed
    1. Crosnier C., Stamataki D., Lewis J. (2006) Organizing cell renewal in the intestine: stem cells, signals and combinatorial control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 349–359 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances