Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2015 Apr 2:2015:bcr2015209353.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-209353.

Suspected ovarian molar pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology conception: a diagnostic challenge

Affiliations
Case Reports

Suspected ovarian molar pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology conception: a diagnostic challenge

Nedaa Obeidi et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

A 32-year-old patient with primary infertility received in vitro fertilisation (IVF) therapy. Four weeks later she developed intermittent left iliac fossa pain. Transvaginal ultrasound showed an empty uterus and an adnexal mass adjacent to the right ovary. Serum β-human chronic gonadotropin was 33,492 IU/L. At laparoscopy a mass attached to right ovary, suggestive of a right ovarian ectopic pregnancy, was excised. Histological examination confirmed an ovarian ectopic gestation, but noted enlarged chorionic villi and trophoblastic atypia, which raised the suspicion of molar pregnancy. Subsequent p57 immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy studies excluded a mole, however. Cases of suspected molar disease in ectopic pregnancy present a diagnostic challenge for both clinicians and histopathologists, and establishing a definitive diagnosis may be difficult.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pelvic ultrasound showing an enlarged right ovary and free fluid in the pelvis, suggestive of ectopic pregnancy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Laparoscopic picture of the pelvis with haemoperitoneum and an enlarged and abnormal right ovary.
Figure 3
Figure 3
H&E slide showing (A) Variably-sized chorionic villi with some hydropic forms (B) Foci of trophoblast hyperplasia.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Positive p57 staining in villous mesenchyme and cytotrophoblast. This staining pattern excludes complete mole, but cannot distinguish between a hydropic abortion and a partial mole.

References

    1. Sebire NJ, Lindsay I, Fisher RA et al. Overdiagnosis of complete and partial hydatidiform mole in tubal ectopic pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2005;24: 260–4. 10.1097/01.pgp.0000164597.19346.b5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Church E, Hanna L, New F et al. Ovarian molar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:660–1. 10.1080/01443610802421734 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suzuki H, Matsubara S, Uchida S et al. Ovary hyperstimulation syndrome accompanying molar pregnancy: case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:803–6. 10.1007/s00404-014-3319-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types