Voice outcomes following radiation versus laser microsurgery for T1 glottic carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 25837666
- PMCID: PMC5560897
- DOI: 10.1177/0194599815577103
Voice outcomes following radiation versus laser microsurgery for T1 glottic carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: Systematic review of literature on patient-reported voice handicap following T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma treatment using transoral laser microsurgery or radiation therapy.
Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (1997-2013).
Review methods: These data sources were searched for papers reporting Voice Handicap Index (VHI) after treatment of early glottic carcinoma. Review and reference cross-checking were performed using a priori selection criteria. Study data were abstracted and publication quality categorized independently by 2 authors. Corresponding authors were contacted to maximize data for analysis. Meta-analysis was performed only with studies that included both treatment modalities, to reduce heterogeneity and maximize rigor; random effects modeling was used to pool results.
Results: Eighteen publications were identified that reported VHI data following surgery and radiotherapy for T1 glottic carcinoma. No studies were randomized. When studies that reported multiple T-stages or systematic treatment selection bias were excluded, 8 retrospective cohort studies describing 362 patients were suitable for meta-analysis. Follow-up time (mean, 47 months; range, 1-298 mo) and extent of surgical excision varied across studies. Six studies showed no VHI difference between treatment arms; 2 favored radiotherapy over surgery (1 of which reported transmuscular cordectomy for all surgical patients); and none favored surgery. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in posttreatment VHI between radiotherapy and surgery (mean difference, -5.52; 95% confidence interval, -11.40, 0.36; heterogeneity I (2) = 61%, P = .01).
Conclusion: VHI scores were comparable following transoral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy for T1 glottic carcinoma in the current literature, suggesting no clinically significant difference in functional voice outcomes between treatment types.
Keywords: glottis/radiotherapy; glottis/surgery; humans; laryngeal neoplasms; laser therapy; neoplasm staging; quality of life; voice disorders; voice quality.
© American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.
Figures
References
-
- Carvalho AL, Nishimoto IN, Califano JA, et al. Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: a site-specific analysis of the SEER database. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:806–816. - PubMed
-
- Groome PA, O’Sullivan B, Irish JC, et al. Glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada and the SEER areas of the United States: do different management philosophies produce different outcome profiles? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:301–315. - PubMed
-
- Dey P, Arnold D, Wight R, et al. Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002:CD002027. - PubMed
-
- Cohen SM, Garrett CG, Dupont WD, et al. Voice-related quality of life in T1 glottic cancer: irradiation versus endoscopic excision. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115:581–586. - PubMed
-
- Higgins KM, Shah MD, Ogaick MJ, et al. Treatment of early-stage glottic cancer: meta-analysis comparison of laser excision versus radiotherapy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38:603–612. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical