Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Apr;29(2):123-31.
doi: 10.1007/s40259-015-0124-7.

Comparability of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim: protein characterization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparability of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim: protein characterization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics

Fritz Sörgel et al. BioDrugs. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Biosimilars provide safety, purity, and potency similar to those of a reference biologic product.

Methods: An array of protein analytical techniques was used to compare the physicochemical properties of proposed biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006), US-approved originator filgrastim, and EU-approved originator filgrastim. Biological characterization involved surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy analyses and in vitro proliferation assays. A randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover, phase I study in healthy volunteers assessed the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety profiles of EP2006 and US-approved originator filgrastim (administered as a single subcutaneous 10 µg/kg injection).

Results: EP2006 and originator filgrastim (US and EU approved) were highly similar with respect to primary, secondary, and tertiary protein structures; mass, size, purity, charge, and hydrophobicity. No differences in receptor binding affinity were observed, and all samples demonstrated similar in vitro bioactivity. In the phase I study, no statistically significant differences between EP2006 and US-approved originator filgrastim were noted in pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic parameters, and all confidence intervals were within the equivalence boundaries. The two products had similar safety profiles.

Conclusion: These studies provide robust evidence of the structural and functional similarity between the proposed biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006) and the US-approved originator filgrastim.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overlay of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatograms of a Glu-C digest peptide map from biosimilar and originator filgrastim
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
1D-{1H}-nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of biosimilar filgrastim (batch DP1), US-approved originator filgrastim (batch NUS1), and EU-approved originator filgrastim (batch NEU1). ppm parts per million. *2,2,3,3-d4 Sodium 3-(trimethylsilyl)propionate (d4-TSP) signal; **signals between 3.4 and 3.9 ppm correspond to formulation components, i.e., are not protein related
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sensorgram overlay of the receptor binding affinities of biosimilar and originator filgrastim, based on a surface plasmon resonance-based interaction assay using Biacore technology. RU resonance units
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pharmacodynamic analysis: geometric mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC)–time profiles for biosimilar and US originator filgrastim
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pharmacokinetic analysis: geometric mean filgrastim concentration–time profiles for biosimilar and US originator filgrastim

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sörgel F, Lerch H, Lauber T. Physicochemical and biologic comparability of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with its reference product. BioDrugs. 2010;24:347–357. doi: 10.2165/11585100-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gascon P, Fuhr U, Sörgel F, Kinzig-Schippers M, Makhson A, Balser S, Einmahl S, Muenzberg M. Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1419–1429. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp574. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blackstone EA, Fuhr JP., Jr Innovation and competition: will biosimilars succeed? The creation of an FDA approval pathway for biosimilars is complex and fraught with hazard. Yes, innovation and market competition are at stake. But so are efficacy and patient safety. Biotechnol Healthc. 2012;9:24–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gascón P, Tesch H, Verpoort K, Rosati MS, Salesi N, Agrawal S, Wilking N, Barker H, Muenzberg M, Turner M. Clinical experience with Zarzio® in Europe: what have we learned? Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:2925–2932. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1911-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verpoort K, Möhler TM. A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2012;4:289–293. doi: 10.1177/1758834012461330. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms