Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;47(6):881-5.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0963-7. Epub 2015 Apr 3.

Revisiting the tethered ureteral stents in children: a novel modification

Affiliations

Revisiting the tethered ureteral stents in children: a novel modification

Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To propose a simple noninvasive method for ureteral stent retrieval using an extraction string sutured to the skin in children.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to gather relevant data from December 2005 to February 2013. After the surgeries, if indicated, a tethered double-J stent was placed in the ureter. A 5-0 non-absorbable Prolene stitch was used as an extraction string passing through the urethra and was sutured to subcoronal skin in boys or inner surface of labia majora in girls. For stent removal, a small amount of 2 % lidocaine jelly was pushed into the urethra 5 min before the procedure. The string was then pulled by continuous and gentle force until the entire stent was out. The suture was then cut to release the stent. No sedation or anesthesia was needed.

Results: A total of 378 double-J stents with extraction strings were inserted for a total of 325 patients (61.2 % male). Of the 53 patients with bilateral ureteral stents, one male patient (1.88 %) experienced early stent protrusion from urethral meatus. Two of 272 patients (0.73 %) with unilateral ureteral stent (one male and one female) encountered the same problem. All other stents were extracted successfully using the extraction string without any complications. No upward stent migration or suture site reaction was encountered.

Conclusion: This method is a safe, easy-to-use, feasible and noninvasive alternative for cystoscopic stent removal with high success rate and minimal complications. This can lead to considerable saving in time and costs for patients, families and healthcare system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):890-3 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2198-202 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2014 Oct;84(4):960-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):719-25 - PubMed
    1. J Endourol. 2012 Apr;26(4):387-92 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources