Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;135(6):811-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2206-x. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures

Shi-Min Chang  1 , Ying-Qi Zhang, Zhuo Ma, Qing Li, Jens Dargel, Peer Eysel
Affiliations

Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures

Shi-Min Chang et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To introduce the concept of fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support and its clinical and radiological correlation in geriatric unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 127 patients (32 men and 95 women, with mean age 78.7 years) with AO/OTA 31A2.2 and 2.3 hip fractures treated with cephalomedullary nail (PFNA-II or Gamma-3) between July 2010 and June 2013 was performed. They were classified into three groups according the grade of medial cortical support in postoperative fracture reduction (positive, neutral, and negative). The positive cortex support was defined that the medial cortex of the head-neck fragment displaced and located a little bit superomedially to the medial cortex of the shaft. If the neck cortex is located laterally to the shaft, it is negative with no cortical buttress, and if the two cortices contact smoothly, it is in neutral position. The demographic baseline, postoperative radiographic femoral neck-shaft angle and neck length, rehabilitation progress and functional recovery scores of each group were recorded and compared.

Results: There were 89 cases (70 %) in positive, 26 in neutral, and 12 in negative support. No statistical differences were found between the three groups among patient age, sex ratio, prefracture score of activity of daily living, walking ability score, ASA physical risk score, number of medical comorbidities, osteoporosis Singh index, fracture reduction quality (Garden alignments), and the position of lag screw or helical blade in femoral head (TAD). In follow-up, patients in positive medial cortical support reduction group had the least loss in neck-shaft angle and neck length, and got ground-walking much earlier than negative reduction group, with good functional outcomes and less hip-thigh pain presence.

Conclusion: Fracture reduction with nonanatomic positive medial cortical support allows limited sliding of the head-neck fragment to contact with the femur shaft and achieve secondary stability, providing a good mechanical environment for fracture healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Positive medial cortex support (PMCS): the proximal femoral head–neck fragment is displaced medially to the upper medial edge of the distal femoral shaft fragment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Neutral position (NP): the medial cortex of head–neck and the shaft fragments are smoothly contacted
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Negative medial cortex support (NMCS): the head–neck fragment is displaced laterally to the upper medial edge of the shaft fragment, which lost the medial cortex support from the femoral shaft
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schematic drawing for NMCS: proximal fragment impacted into the comminuted and low-density trochanteric region until touching the fixation nail. Arrows show the cortex–cancellous contact
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Schematic drawing for PMCS: the medial cortex of shaft resists proximal fragment from further sliding laterally. Arrows show the cortex–cortex contact
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Excellent quality of fracture reduction. Slight valgus and 180° for alignment, positive cortical support and smooth anterior cortical contact for displacement in AP and lateral radiography were achieved
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Russell TA, Sanders R. Pertrochanteric hip fractures: time for change. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(4):189–190. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f221c1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsang ST, Aitken SA, Golay SK, Silverwood RK, Biant LC. When does hip fracture surgery fail? Injury. 2014;45(7):1059–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, Mommsen P, Suntardjo S, Krettek C, Hildebrand F. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hipscrews after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36(11):2347–2354. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1636-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, Fragkomichalos E, Papadimas D, Pappadas I. Evolving concepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures—a review. Injury. 2012;43(6):686–693. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suhm N, Kaelin R, Studer P, Wang Q, Kressig RW, Rikli D, Jakob M, Pretto M. Orthogeriatric care pathway: prospective survey of impact on length of stay, mortality and institutionalisation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(9):1261–1269. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2057-x. - DOI - PubMed