Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;64(12):1339-42.

Medical students' perspective about factors motivating participation in small group discussions

  • PMID: 25842573

Medical students' perspective about factors motivating participation in small group discussions

Aneeq Ullah Baig Mirza et al. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To assess perceptions of medical students about the factors that may enhance motivation for learning through small group discussions.

Methods: The qualitative descriptive study was conducted in May, 2013, at Riphah International University, Islamabad, and comprised undergraduate medical students from the first to the fourth year who were given a questionnaire that sought their opinion about group characteristics, composition, expectations from the teachers, environment, additional tools and optimum time duration. The effects of granting extra marks for active participation, feedback and weightage of attendance in enhancing motivation in small group discussions were also explored. Common themes from within the responses were highlighted.

Results: Initially, 400 students were given the questionnaire, but complete responses were received from 290(72.5%). About the effective group size, 221(76.2%) suggested 12 or less students, while 153(52.75%) thought groups should be divided into subgroups according to the task, and 148(51.03%) were in favour of mixed gender composition of a group. A comfortable and air-conditioned environment was suggested as a motivating factor by 156(53.79%) students. Use of models, laptops and internet during the discussion was suggested by 97(33.44%) students, and 232(80%) suggested an hour or less as sufficient time. Grant of extra marks 209(72.06%), feedback 220(75.86%) and weightage of attendance 193(66.55%) were all considered positive motivating factors. Finally, 250(86.20%) were in favour of continuation of small group discussion as a learning tool.

Conclusion: Most students thought a smaller size makes a small group discussion more effective, and that it should continue to be used as one of the learning modalities.

PubMed Disclaimer