Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1989 Oct;27(10):2397-9.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2397-2399.1989.

Standardization of yeast inocula with an electronic impedance counter

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Standardization of yeast inocula with an electronic impedance counter

C Eng et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct.

Abstract

The standardization of yeast inocula has been identified as an important variable in the performance of reproducible in vitro fungal susceptibility testing. We investigated the precision and accuracy of an electronic particle counter in preparing yeast inocula, with quantitative culture used as a "gold standard." Suspensions of Candida albicans and Torulopsis glabrata standardized with a particle counter at 10(6) counts per ml were highly reproducible when cultured quantitatively (coefficients of variation, 6.7 and 6.8%, respectively). Accuracies of particle counts, compared with those of quantitative culture, were -8.5 and +2.8% for the two species, respectively. Electronic cell counts were highly linear between 5 X 10(6) and 5 X 10(4) CFU/ml (R2 greater than 0.99). Multiple electronic counts of a single suspension of C. albicans had less variation than did multiple quantitative cultures of a suspension of the same organism (coefficients of variation, 2.4 versus 8.9%; P less than 0.01), suggesting that impedance counting is probably more precise than quantitative culture. Electronic particle counters can be used to prepare accurate, reproducible yeast inocula. The method may be more accurate and is more precise than other techniques commonly used to standardize yeast suspensions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1969;76(3):447-58 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Oct;4(4):392-5 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):249-54 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1437-41 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):298-301 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources