Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;23(6):446-453.
doi: 10.1177/0963721414549350.

Health Neuroscience: Defining a New Field

Affiliations

Health Neuroscience: Defining a New Field

Kirk I Erickson et al. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Health neuroscience is a new field that is at the interface of health psychology and neuroscience. It is concerned with the interplay between the brain and physical health over the lifespan. This review provides a conceptual introduction to health neuroscience, focusing on its major themes, representative studies, methodologies, and future directions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health neuroscience is an interdisciplinary field at the interface of health psychology and neuroscience. Thematically, health neuroscience is concerned with understanding how the brain influences and is influenced by physical health across the lifespan—extending along a continuum shown at the bottom of the figure of optimal states of health and well being to states of disease risk, symptom expression, and clinical illness. Distal contextual influences at the top of the figure are viewed to impact physical health via downstream effects that are mediated by the brain, including social (e.g., familial and peer networks), cultural (e.g., valued group identities and shared practices), environmental (e.g., counties, neighborhoods, workplaces, etc.), interventional (e.g., efforts to change physical activity, diets, lifestyles, psychological states, etc.), and health policy (e.g., laws affecting the distribution of health resources, public health messaging and campaigns, etc.) influences. Proximal influences at the bottom of the figure are viewed to impact physical health via direct and interactive effects on the brain, as well as via mediating processes that affect and are affected by the brain, including genetic, epigenetic, developmental, and aging influences. Processes that bi-directionally and dynamically link the brain to states of health throughout life include factors that are widely studied in health psychology, but also studied historically in separate fields of study; namely, cognitive, stress, emotion, health behavioral, peripheral physiological, and gene expression processes. Health neuroscience studies are diverse and integrative, insofar as these processes are viewed as being regulated by the brain via top-down (efferent) pathways and as influencing the brain via bottom-up (afferent) pathways. In this way, health neuroscience studies conceptualize measurements of brain function and structure as outcome variables that are dependent on bottom-up pathways and as independent variables that determine health processes via top-down pathways.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In this figure, Erickson and colleagues (2011) demonstrated that a 1 year randomized exercise intervention resulted in an increase in the size of the hippocampus relative to the control group, but no significant changes in the size of the caudate nucleus or thalamus. This example illustrates how a health behavior intervention (i.e., exercise) affects brain structure in ways that predict cognitive functioning.

References

    1. Adler N, Matthews K. Health psychology: why do some people get sick and some stay well? Annu Rev Psychol. 1994;45:229–259. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.001305. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akdeniz C, Tost H, Streit F, Haddad L, Wüst S, Schäfer A, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Neuroimaging evidence for a role of neural social stress processing in ethnic minority associated environmental risk. JAMA Psychiatry 2014 - PubMed
    1. Atlas LY, Bolger N, Lindquist MA, Wager TD. Brain mediators of predictive cue effects on perceived pain. J Neurosci. 2010;30(39):12964–12977. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0057-10.2010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berkman ET, Falk EB, Lieberman MD. In the trenches of real-world self-control: neural correlates of breaking the link between craving and smoking. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(4):498–506. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400918. This paper examines brain regions involved in self-control that are associated with smoking, craving, and the attempt to quit smoking. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chida Y, Steptoe A. Greater cardiovascular responses to laboratory mental stress are associated with poor subsequent cardiovascular risk status: a meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Hypertension. 2010;55(4):1026–1032. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.146621. HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.146621 [pii] - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources