Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;16(4):e173-80.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71116-7.

Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye

Affiliations
Review

Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye

Vinod P Balachandran et al. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Nomograms are widely used as prognostic devices in oncology and medicine. With the ability to generate an individual probability of a clinical event by integrating diverse prognostic and determinant variables, nomograms meet our desire for biologically and clinically integrated models and fulfill our drive towards personalised medicine. Rapid computation through user-friendly digital interfaces, together with increased accuracy, and more easily understood prognoses compared with conventional staging, allow for seamless incorporation of nomogram-derived prognosis to aid clinical decision making. This has led to the appearance of many nomograms on the internet and in medical journals, and an increase in nomogram use by patients and physicians alike. However, the statistical foundations of nomogram construction, their precise interpretation, and evidence supporting their use are generally misunderstood. This issue is leading to an under-appreciation of the inherent uncertainties regarding nomogram use. We provide a systematic, practical approach to evaluating and comprehending nomogram-derived prognoses, with particular emphasis on clarifying common misconceptions and highlighting limitations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Using and interpreting a nomogram
A. A nomogram example – estimating recurrence-free survival (RFS) in resected primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Draw an upward vertical line to the “Points” bar to calculate points. Based on the sum, draw a downward vertical line from the “Total Points” line to calculate RFS.(14) B. Calibration curves of a nomogram estimating RFS in resected primary GIST. Red line: nomogram RFS = observed RFS. Blue line - actual calibration. Circles - median. X - mean. 95% confidence intervals are depicted for each point along the calibration curve.(14)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Assessing clinical utility using a decision analysis curve
Decision analysis curve of a nomogram predicting seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in prostate cancer. At a threshold probability of < 5%, > 50%, the nomogram is irrelevant.(32)

References

    1. Grimes DA. The nomogram epidemic: resurgence of a medical relic. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 19;149(4):273–5. - PubMed
    1. Gospodarowicz M, Benedet L, Hutter RV, Fleming I, Henson DE, Sobin LH. History and international developments in cancer staging. Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Dec;2(6):262–8. - PubMed
    1. Cho CS, Gonen M, Shia J, Kattan MW, Klimstra DS, Jarnagin WR, et al. A novel prognostic nomogram is more accurate than conventional staging systems for predicting survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):281–91. - PubMed
    1. Kattan MW. Nomograms are superior to staging and risk grouping systems for identifying high-risk patients: preoperative application in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2003 Mar;13(2):111–6. - PubMed
    1. Wong SL, Kattan MW, McMasters KM, Coit DG. A nomogram that predicts the presence of sentinel node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Apr;12(4):282–8. - PubMed

Publication types