Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul;17(7):682-8.
doi: 10.1111/dom.12468. Epub 2015 May 8.

Faster-acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin aspart

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Faster-acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin aspart

T Heise et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of faster-acting insulin aspart and insulin aspart in a randomized, single-centre, double-blind study.

Methods: Fifty-two patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 40.3 years) received faster-acting insulin aspart, insulin aspart, or another faster aspart formulation (not selected for further development), each as a single 0.2 U/kg subcutaneous dose, under glucose-clamp conditions, in a three-way crossover design (3-12 days washout between dosing).

Results: Faster-acting insulin aspart had a faster onset of exposure compared with insulin aspart, shown by a 57% earlier onset of appearance [4.9 vs 11.2 min; ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36; 0.51], a 35% earlier time to reach 50% maximum concentration (20.7 vs 31.6 min; ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.59; 0.72) and a greater early exposure within 90 min after dosing. The greatest difference occurred during the first 15 min, when area under the serum insulin aspart curve was 4.5-fold greater with faster-acting insulin aspart than with insulin aspart. Both treatments had a similar time to maximum concentration, total exposure and maximum concentration. Faster-acting insulin aspart had a significantly greater glucose-lowering effect within 90 min after dosing [largest difference: area under the curve for the glucose infusion rate (AUC(GIR), 0-30 min) ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.13; 2.02] and 17% earlier time to reach 50% maximum glucose infusion rate (38.3 vs 46.1 min; ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.73; 0.94). The primary endpoint (AUC(GIR, 0-2 h)) was 10% greater for faster-acting insulin aspart, but did not reach statistical significance (ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.00; 1.22). Both treatments had similar total and maximum glucose-lowering effects, indicating similar overall potency.

Conclusions: Faster-acting insulin aspart was found to have earlier onset and higher early exposure than insulin aspart, and a greater early glucose-lowering effect, with similar potency.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01618188.

Keywords: faster-acting insulin aspart; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; postprandial glucose; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (± standard error of the mean) concentration–time profiles for faster‐acting insulin aspart and insulin aspart from (A) 0–7 h and (B) 0–2 h (early phase).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glucose‐lowering effect (raw mean glucose infusion rate profiles) of faster‐acting insulin aspart and insulin aspart from (A) 0–7 h and (B) 0–2 h (early phase).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Early glucose‐lowering effect [mean glucose infusion rate (GIR) profiles] of (A) faster‐acting insulin aspart and insulin aspart and (B) insulin aspart and human insulin (data on file and adapted from Heinemann et al. 1997 20). The GIR endpoint [area under the curve (AUC)GIR, 0–30 min] for both studies was analysed using a linear mixed‐model with treatment and period as fixed effects, and subject as a random effect. Ratios and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Fieller's method.

References

    1. Woerle HJ, Neumann C, Zschau S et al. Impact of fasting and postprandial glycemia on overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetes importance of postprandial glycemia to achieve target HbA1c levels. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 77: 280–285. - PubMed
    1. International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group . Guideline for management of postmeal glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 103: 256–268. - PubMed
    1. Nesher R, Cerasi E. Modeling phasic insulin release: immediate and time‐dependent effects of glucose. Diabetes 2002; 51(Suppl. 1): S53–59. - PubMed
    1. Bruce DG, Chisholm DJ, Storlien LH, Kraegen EW. Physiological importance of deficiency in early prandial insulin secretion in non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes. Diabetes 1988; 37: 736–744. - PubMed
    1. Del Prato S, Tiengo A. The importance of first‐phase insulin secretion: implications for the therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2001; 17: 164–174. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data