Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jun;60(6):966-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.02.025. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Effects of aging on evoked retrusive tongue actions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of aging on evoked retrusive tongue actions

Benjamin J Becker et al. Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Tongue strength, timing, and coordination deficits may underlie age-related swallowing function. Retrusive tongue actions are likely important in retrograde bolus transport. However, age-related changes in retrusive tongue muscle contractile properties have not been identified in animal studies. Because previous studies employed whole hypoglossal nerve stimulation that activated both protrusive and retrusive tongue muscles, co-contraction may have masked retrusive muscle force decrements. The hypotheses of this study were: (1) retrusive tongue muscle contraction forces would be diminished and temporal characteristics prolonged in old rats when lateral nerves were selectively activated, and (2) greater muscle contractile forces with selective lateral branch stimulation would be found relative to whole hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Design: Nineteen Fischer 344/Brown Norway rats (9 old, 10 young adult) underwent tongue muscle contractile property recording elicited by: (1) bilateral whole hypoglossal nerve stimulation, and (2) selective lateral branch stimulation. Twitch contraction time (CT), half-decay time, maximal twitch and tetanic forces, and a fatigue index were measured.

Results: For whole nerve stimulation, CT was significantly longer in the old group. No significant age group differences were found with selective lateral nerve stimulation. Significantly reduced twitch forces (old group only), increased tetanic forces and significantly less fatigue were found with selective lateral nerve stimulation than with whole hypoglossal stimulation.

Conclusions: Retrusive tongue forces are not impaired in old rats. Deficits observed in swallowing with aging may be due to other factors such as inadequate bolus propulsive forces, mediated by protrusive tongue muscles, or timing/coordination of muscle actions.

Keywords: Aging; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Hypoglossal nerve; Tongue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative twitch and tetanic tension signals during whole nerve and lateral branch stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve (HN) from young adult and old animals. There was a szignificant increase in tetanic forces for lateral branch HN stimulation when compared with stimulation of the whole nerve (p<.001). There was no age affect on either whole nerve or lateral branch stimulation values.

References

    1. González-Fernández M, Humbert I, Winegrad H, Cappola AR, Fried LP. Dysphagia in old-old women: prevalence as determined according to self-report and the 3-ounce water swallowing test. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(4):716–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robbins JA, Hamilton JW, Lot GL, Kempster GB. Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different ages. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:823–9. - PubMed
    1. Shaw DW, Cook IJ, Gabb M, et al. Influence of normal aging on oral-pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter function during swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:G389–96. - PubMed
    1. Ekberg O, Feinberg MJ. Altered swallowing function in elderly patients without dysphagia: radiologic findings in 56 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156:1181–4. - PubMed
    1. Nilsson H, Ekberg O, Olsson R, Hindfelt B. Quantitative aspects of swallowing in an elderly nondysphagic population. Dysphagia. 1996;11(3):180–4. - PubMed

Publication types