Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;18(1):34-40.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv073. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

Smoking Status Confirmation by Proxy: Validation in a Smoking Cessation Trial

Susan Regan  1 , Zachary Z Reid  2 , Jennifer H K Kelley  3 , Michele Reyen  2 , Molly Korotkin  3 , Sandra J Japuntich  4 , Joseph C Viana  5 , Douglas E Levy  6 , Nancy A Rigotti  6
Affiliations

Smoking Status Confirmation by Proxy: Validation in a Smoking Cessation Trial

Susan Regan et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Biochemical confirmation (BC) of self-report is the gold standard of evidence for abstinence in smoking cessation research, but difficulty in obtaining samples may bias estimates of quit rates. Proxy confirmation (PC) has not been validated in cessation trials. We assessed the feasibility and validity of PC in a cessation trial for hospitalized smokers.

Methods: We enrolled 402 daily cigarette smokers during a hospital admission. At enrollment, participants provided demographics, smoking history, and named proxies to confirm their smoking status at follow-up. Participants provided self-reported (SR) 7-day tobacco abstinence by telephone at 6 months post-discharge. SR quitters were asked to mail a saliva sample for BC. Incentives were offered for survey completion ($20) and returned samples ($50). We called proxies for all those with SR to obtain PC. Quit rates were calculated with missing data indicating smoking. We assessed associations of nonresponse with baseline characteristics using chi-squared tests and logistic regression. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of PC in detecting smokers as determined by BC.

Results: All patients named at least one proxy. Response rates were 82% for SR, 84% for PC, and 69% for BC. Observed participant characteristics were unrelated to provision of sample for BC. Estimated quit rates were 35% for SR, 27% for SR + PC, 21% for SR + BC and 27% for SR + BC or PC. Sensitivity of PC was not higher than SR (73% vs. 77%); specificity was lower (84% vs. 100%).

Conclusion: PC was feasible but not superior to self-report in a cessation trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Smoking status at 6-month follow-up by self-report, proxy, and biochemical verification.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Noonan D, Jiang Y, Duffy SA. Utility of biochemical verification of tobacco cessation in the department of veterans affairs. Addict Behav. 2013;38(3):1792–1795. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.11.006. - PMC - PubMed
    1. SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4(2):149–159. 10.1080/14622200210123581. - PubMed
    1. McLaughlin JK, Dietz MS, Mehl ES, Blot WJ. Reliability of surrogate information on cigarette smoking by type of informant. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126(1):144–146. - PubMed
    1. Gilpin EA, Pierce JP, Cavin SW, et al. Estimates of population smoking prevalence: self-vs proxy reports of smoking status. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(10):1576–1579. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyland A, Cummings KM, Lynn WR, Corle D, Giffen CA. Effect of proxy-reported smoking status on population estimates of smoking prevalence. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(8):746–751. - PubMed

Publication types