Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 27:9:517-28.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S78225. eCollection 2015.

Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon

Wijdan H Ramadan  1 , Noura A Khreis  2 , Wissam K Kabbara  1
Affiliations

Simplicity, safety, and acceptability of insulin pen use versus the conventional vial/syringe device in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon

Wijdan H Ramadan et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the simplicity, safety, patients' preference, and convenience of the administration of insulin using the pen device versus the conventional vial/syringe in patients with diabetes.

Methods: This observational study was conducted in multiple community pharmacies in Lebanon. The investigators interviewed patients with diabetes using an insulin pen or conventional vial/syringe. A total of 74 questionnaires were filled over a period of 6 months. Answers were entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software and Excel spreadsheet. t-test, logistic regression analysis, and correlation analysis were used in order to analyze the results.

Results: A higher percentage of patients from the insulin pen users group (95.2%) found the method easy to use as compared to only 46.7% of the insulin conventional users group (P 0.001, relative risk [RR]: 2.041, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.178-3.535). Moreover, 61.9% and 26.7% of pen users and conventional users, respectively, could read the scale easily (P 0.037, RR 2.321, 95% CI: 0.940-5.731), while 85.7% of pen users found it more convenient shifting to pen and 86.7% of the conventional users would want to shift to pen if it had the same cost. Pain perception was statistically different between the groups. A much higher percentage (76.2%) of pen users showed no pain during injection compared to only 26.7% of conventional users (P 0.003, RR 2.857, 95% CI: 1.194-6.838).

Conclusion: The insulin pen was significantly much easier to use and less painful than the conventional vial/syringe. Proper education on the methods of administration/storage and disposal of needles/syringes is needed in both groups.

Keywords: conventional vial/syringe; diabetes; hypoglycemia; insulin pen; needle phobia; pain perception; secretagogue.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. de Bode C. 10 facts about diabetes [webpage on the Internet] Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. [Accessed July 1, 2014]. Available from: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/diabetes/facts/en/
    1. Brunton S. Insulin delivery systems: reducing barriers to insulin therapy and advancing diabetes mellitus treatment. Am J Med. 2008;121(6 Suppl):S35–S41. - PubMed
    1. Wright B, Bellone J, McCoy E. A review of insulin pen devices and use in the elderly diabetic population. Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes. 2010;3:53–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S14–S80. - PubMed
    1. Meece J. Effect of insulin pen devices on the management of diabetes mellitus. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(11):1076–1082. - PubMed