Leveraging electronic tablets for general pediatric care: a pilot study
- PMID: 25848409
- PMCID: PMC4377556
- DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2014-09-RA-0071
Leveraging electronic tablets for general pediatric care: a pilot study
Abstract
Background: We have previously shown that a scan-able paper based interface linked to a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) can effectively screen patients in pediatric waiting rooms and support the physician using evidence based care guidelines at the time of clinical encounter. However, the use of scan-able paper based interface has many inherent limitations including lacking real time communication with the CDSS and being prone to human and system errors. An electronic tablet based user interface can not only overcome these limitations, but may also support advanced functionality for clinical and research use. However, use of such devices for pediatric care is not well studied in clinical settings.
Objective: In this pilot study, we enhance our pediatric CDSS with an electronic tablet based user interface and evaluate it for usability as well as for changes in patient questionnaire completion rates.
Methods: Child Health Improvement through Computers Leveraging Electronic Tablets or CHICLET is an electronic tablet based user interface. It is developed to augment the existing scan-able paper interface to our CDSS. For the purposes of this study, we deployed CHICLET in one outpatient pediatric clinic. Usability factors for CHICLET were evaluated via caregiver and staff surveys.
Results: When compared to the scan-able paper based interface, we observed an 18% increase or 30% relative increase in question completion rates using CHICLET. This difference was statistically significant. Caregivers and staff survey results were positive for using CHICLET in clinical environment.
Conclusions: Electronic tablets are a viable interface for capturing patient self-report in pediatric waiting rooms. We further hypothesize that the use of electronic tablet based interfaces will drive advances in computerized clinical decision support and create opportunities for patient engagement.
Keywords: CDSS; EMR; Electronic tablets; children; clinical decision support system; pediatrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the research.
Figures
References
-
- Kreps GL, Neuhauser L.New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 78(3):329–336 Epub 2010/03/06. doi: S0738–3991(10)00022–4 [pii] 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013. PubMed PMID: 20202779. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Garner AS, Shonkoff JP, Siegel BS, Dobbins MI, Earls MF, McGuinn L, Pascoe J, Wood DL. Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: translating developmental science into lifelong health. Pediatrics 2012; 129(1):e224–e231 Epub 2011/12/28. doi: peds.2011–2662 [pii] 10.1542/peds.2011–2662. PubMed PMID: 22201148. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mangione-Smith R, DeCristofaro AH, Setodji CM, Keesey J, Klein DJ, Adams JL, Schuster MA, McGlynn EA. The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(15):1515–1523 Epub 2007/10/12. doi: 357/15/1515 [pii] 10.1056/NEJMsa064637. PubMed PMID: 17928599. - DOI - PubMed
