Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 2;1(1):1015.
doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1015. eCollection 2013.

Advances in Patient-Reported Outcomes: The NIH PROMIS(®) Measures

Affiliations

Advances in Patient-Reported Outcomes: The NIH PROMIS(®) Measures

Joan E Broderick et al. EGEMS (Wash DC). .

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are questionnaire measures of patients' symptoms, functioning, and health-related quality of life. They are designed to provide important clinical information that generally cannot be captured with objective medical testing. In 2004, the National Institutes of Health launched a research initiative to improve the clinical research enterprise by developing state-of-the-art PROs. The NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) and Assessment Center are the products of that initiative. Adult, pediatric, and parent-proxy item banks have been developed by using contemporary psychometric methods, yielding rapid, accurate measurements. PROMIS currently provides tools for assessing physical, mental, and social health using short-form and computer-adaptive testing methods. The PROMIS tools are being adopted for use in clinical trials and translational research. They are also being introduced in clinical medicine to assess a broad range of disease outcomes. Recent legislative developments in the United States support greater efforts to include patients' reports of health experience in order to evaluate treatment outcomes, engage in shared decision-making, and prioritize the focus of treatment. PROs have garnered increased attention by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for evaluating drugs and medical devices. Recent calls for comparative effectiveness research favor inclusion of PROs. PROs could also potentially improve quality of care and disease outcomes, provide patient-centered assessment for comparative effectiveness research, and enable a common metric for tracking outcomes across providers and medical systems.

Keywords: comparative effectiveness; informatics; patient involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PROMIS Adult Domains Available as of 2013
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PROMIS Pediatric (8 to 17 years old) and Parent-Proxy Report (5 to 17 years old) Domains Available as of 2013

References

    1. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magasi S, Ryan G, Revicki D, et al. Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(5):739–746. - PubMed
    1. Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S53–57. - PubMed
    1. Litcher-Kelly L, Martino S, Broderick J, Stone A. A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic pain in randomized clinical trails and controlled trials. Journal of Pain. 2007;8(12):906–913. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahimi K, Malhotra A, Banning AP, Jenkinson C. Outcome selection and role of patient reported outcomes in contemporary cardiovascular trials: systematic review. Bmj. 2010;341:c5707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5707. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources