Electronic Data Capture through Total Joint Replacement Registries
- PMID: 25848569
- PMCID: PMC4371429
- DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1014
Electronic Data Capture through Total Joint Replacement Registries
Abstract
The move toward adoption and implementation of electronic health records (EHR) provides an opportunity in the United States to use electronic clinical data (ECD) to better understand patient outcomes and to improve the quality and efficiency of medical care. Within the field of orthopedics, national joint replacement registries have been shown in other countries to improve clinical decision-making and outcomes after joint arthroplasty. Thus, there is increasing interest among U.S. clinical investigators and policymakers to utilize ECD to develop national and regional joint replacement registries. We discuss our experience with integrating electronic data capture and reporting methodology into the California Joint Replacement Registry and American Joint Replacement Registry initiatives. The use of ECD for joint replacement registries will better facilitate multi-stakeholder collaboration, improve the quality of care, reduce medical spending, and foster customized evidence-based clinical decision-making.
Similar articles
-
Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. Total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 17;96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):104-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00328. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. PMID: 25520425 Free PMC article.
-
Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry: aligning operations with information technology.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Oct;468(10):2646-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1463-9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 20652461 Free PMC article.
-
Registry data trends of total ankle replacement use.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Nov-Dec;52(6):728-35. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.08.006. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013. PMID: 24160721
-
Arthroplasty implant registries over the past five decades: Development, current, and future impact.J Orthop Res. 2018 Sep;36(9):2319-2330. doi: 10.1002/jor.24014. Epub 2018 May 24. J Orthop Res. 2018. PMID: 29663575 Review.
-
Assessing the comparability of hip arthroplasty registries in order to improve the recording and monitoring of outcome.Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):442-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.36501. Bone Joint J. 2016. PMID: 27037425 Review.
References
-
- DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60. - PubMed
-
- Jha AK. Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead. JAMA. 2010;304(15):1709–10. - PubMed
-
- de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract. 2006;23(2):253–63. - PubMed
-
- Nelson EC, Splaine ME, Batalden PB, Plume SK. Building measurement and data collection into medical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(6):460–6. - PubMed
-
- Robertsson O. Knee arthroplasty registers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(1):1–4. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources